Damian Krzeminski wrote: > In addition to what Scott said: If you want it you can set up a > provisioning server separate from a primary server even today (replicate > provisioning directory, set-up FTP/TFTP/HTTP servers, set up DNS so that > phones find the best provisioning server. > I saw little demand for that though: when you actually configure your > phones your provisioning server is up (otherwise you cannot configure the > phones). Serving static files has negligible impact on primary server > performance. And finally if sipXconfig is stopped other sipx services are > still fully functional. > Separating provisioning server is probably more important from "no-access > behind firewall" perspective. > Damian,
I see your point. As usual I was being a bit too paranoid over redundancy. Thanks for the input. Damian _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
