Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:11 +0100, Damian Dowling wrote: > > >> SipXconfig running on a single server I can understand, it makes >> everything a lot simpler from a programming point of view. Although it >> would be nice for load balancing reasons to allow users to access their >> accounts via different servers. >> > > That's a feature that's being looked at, but we don't have any firm > plans yet. > > >> However, I find storing the phone profiles only on the primary server >> surprising. It would improve redundancy if the profiles were also stored >> on the secondary server. Is this planned for the future? >> > > At present, the way most phones retrieve configuration information is > too limited - there is no way to tell the phones "try one of the > following redundant locations". However, that is a feature of a new > Technical Recommendation on SIP User Agent Configuration that is being > worked on in the SIP Forum [1]. The latest draft documents for that > group are available [2]. > > I hope and believe that we will be able to include support for this new > standard in sipXecs 4.2 (we already support a significant fraction of > it). Whether or not users can leverage that depends on what phones > support it (ask your phone vendors). > > [1] http://www.sipforum.org/content/view/311/253 > [2] > http://www.sipforum.org/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/gid,66/Itemid,75/ > Scott,
Thanks for the info, that clears things up. Damian _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
