Scott and Others, Would you recommend using the upgrade function from the GUI, or just using the backup/restore feature to utilize the new version, basically backing up old configuration, and using restore function on the new install? Using the upgrade function would drastically save us from long downtime and after hours work :). Thanks,
--- On Mon, 6/22/09, Chris St Denis <chris.stde...@vhisper.com> wrote: From: Chris St Denis <chris.stde...@vhisper.com> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] [sipX-dev] Release 4.0.1 is posted To: "Scott Lawrence" <scott.lawre...@nortel.com> Cc: "sipX users" <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>, "sipX developers" <sipx-...@list.sipfoundry.org> Received: Monday, June 22, 2009, 1:27 PM Great to see 4.0.1 out. Looks like somebody forgot to sign at least one of the packages tho. I did a yum update and got "Package sipxcommserverlib-doc-4.0.1-015823.i386.rpm is not signed" Seems to update fine with gpg check off. Scott Lawrence wrote: > Release 4.0.1 of sipXecs is stable, and has been posted to the public > distribution area. > > A full 110 issues were fixed (and 35 more resolved in other ways) since > 4.0.0 - an amazing record in only 2 months! Thanks to all the community > members that tried the .0 release. > > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX/fixforversion/10560 > > I recommend that any production system upgrade to the 4.0.1 release. If > you are on 3.10.x and have been waiting for a better 4.0 to upgrade to, > this is it. > > The distribution areas have been moved to a new host > (www.sipxecssw.org), but the old URLs will be maintained indefinitely, > so you do not need to update your yum configurations. > > We've had offers from a couple of community members to help with setting > up mirrors, so that should be happening soon... watch this space. > > Note - because we have had more problems reported with it (probably > because it gets substantially less pre-release testing) we have decided > that for the time being at least we are not going to post ISO images of > the CentOS 64 bit builds. The RPMs are still being built and posted, > and there are no plans to discontinue them, but if you're setting up a > new system we recommend the 32 bit builds (there is no significant > difference it running the 32 bit build even on 64 bit hardware). > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list sipx-...@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
