> software from vendors that can adhere to problems escalations and rapid > software fixes as needed. The burdens for this in the open source world, > due to the legal needs to always evolving e911 regulatory requirements, are > pretty harsh.
I was hoping that the system was fairly standardized by now and that there might be options other than Intrado for example. In fact, other than other proprietary systems I don't know the names of, Intrado is the only gateway I know of by name. > At the same time, the legal implications of being responsible > for something when there is no vendor standing behind you if a complaint if Yes, this makes sense and the responsibilities usually flow up the line, provider wise so I suppose no one wants to take changes. It was worth asking but I still wonder how most folks using sipx in this case, handle this problem. Do most maintain some sort of list which they update the provider with? In our case, we update on an Intrado system. Mike _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
