Ok, thanks. I think dns is fine. I'll trace next time it fails. Hopefully never! :-)
//Ola 2010-02-26 14:27, Scott Lawrence skrev: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:02 +0100, Ola Samuelson wrote: > >> >>> To debug this, you'll need to trace the message flow and see >>> what's going wrong. See: >>> >>> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r0/Display+SIP+message >>> >> +flow+using+Sipviewer >> >>> >>> >> Thanks, should i do this even if no calls went through? >> > Unless you do that, you can't tell whether calls ever got to the system > or not. > > >> In all fields in phone config i have the sip-domain name. No ip:s anywhere. >> So, as far as i know all phones register using the sip domain-name. Doesn't >> the log line >> you highlighted say _from_where_ the registration came. Right? >> > The log line you quoted was a timeout response to a REGISTER request. > There isn't enough in it to see what was wrong with the request itself. > > >> And that is why we see ip:s since the phones have no dns-names. No? >> >> Registration has worked for weeks and all phones re-registered automatically >> when i restarted the services this morning. What has happened is that >> suddenly no calls can go anywhere. >> Surely this can not be related to phone registration as not even calls from >> outside to AA worked. Can it? >> >> The 192.168.101.104 ip is the address of a phone. Are you saying that the >> hostnames of phones >> must be set so that they belong to the sip-domain? >> > > >> I thought only the target, registrar had to have a proper dns. Not the >> clients. >> > No... phones don't need host names at all, but they should always refer > to the service using the domain name. > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
