Um, G711 uses no more than 83k including overhead. If you don't have an extra 40-50k it doesn't really matter. G729 does drop calls like hot potatoes as compared to G711.
Where do you get 128k? ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Scheidell <scheid...@secnap.net> To: Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> Cc: ger...@sustaa.com <ger...@sustaa.com>; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> Sent: Fri May 21 11:48:57 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users yes, but if the bandwidth is that bad, the 128K G.711 uses vs 32K on G.729a, if you don't have 32K, what happens when you don't have 128K? On 5/21/10 11:47 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > G729 uses less bandwidth is all. It is perhaps more likely to "drop" calls > due to network latency and traffic related issues though. Beware. > ============================ > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org> > To: Michael Scheidell<scheid...@secnap.net>; > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> > Sent: Fri May 21 11:43:13 2010 > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension > andInternalusers to Remote users > > Can you talk more about the license for G.729A? How would one go about > implementing this? > > > From: Michael Scheidell > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:40 AM > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and > Internal users to Remote users > > > On 5/21/10 11:26 AM, Jermaine Pinder wrote: > What's the best approche to setup QoS between internal and remote users > that > are using UDP ports between 30000-31000? > > just so you know, your ISP and/or the ISP on the other end, or on any > of > the 15 hops in between might not even support QOS. > > your best bet is to use G.729a (which might require licensing. sipx AA > and > VM don't support G.729a, but there is a possibility that a freeswitch $10 > per channel G.729a license might work). > > QOS is just a 'request'. > > if you do this, also consider QOS on udp port 5060. > > > > > -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
