Can you clear something up for me now that we are talking codecs, other than 
G711 what are the codecs that are supported system wide? IE: By voicemail, 
sipx bridge, gateways, etc. I know I could look this up and find it all, but 
you seem to know what you are talking about!! Also, if I want to use a 
certain codec how would I go about making it system wide?

Thanks!

Gerald

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Tony Graziano" <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:51 AM
To: <scheid...@secnap.net>
Cc: <ger...@sustaa.com>; <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and 
Internal users to Remote users

> Um, G711 uses no more than 83k including overhead.
>
> If you don't have an extra 40-50k it doesn't really matter. G729 does drop
> calls like hot potatoes as compared to G711.
>
> Where do you get 128k?
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Scheidell <scheid...@secnap.net>
> To: Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> Cc: ger...@sustaa.com <ger...@sustaa.com>; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Sent: Fri May 21 11:48:57 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and
> Internal users to Remote users
>
> yes, but if the bandwidth is that bad, the 128K G.711 uses vs 32K on 
> G.729a,
>
> if you don't have 32K, what happens when you don't have 128K?
>
>
>
> On 5/21/10 11:47 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>> G729 uses less bandwidth is all. It is perhaps more likely to "drop" 
>> calls
>> due to network latency and traffic related issues though. Beware.
>> ============================
>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>> Fax: 434.984.8431
>>
>> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>>
>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>> Fax: 434.984.8427
>>
>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>> <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
>> To: Michael Scheidell<scheid...@secnap.net>;
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
>> Sent: Fri May 21 11:43:13 2010
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension
>> andInternalusers to Remote users
>>
>> Can you talk more about the license for G.729A? How would one go about
>> implementing this?
>>
>>
>> From: Michael Scheidell
>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:40 AM
>> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and
>> Internal users to Remote users
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/10 11:26 AM, Jermaine Pinder wrote:
>> What's the best approche to setup QoS between internal and remote users
>> that
>> are using UDP ports between 30000-31000?
>>
>>    just so you know, your ISP and/or the ISP on the other end, or on any
>> of
>> the 15 hops in between might not even support QOS.
>>
>> your best bet is to use G.729a (which might require licensing.  sipx AA
>> and
>> VM don't support G.729a, but there is a possibility that a freeswitch $10
>> per channel G.729a license might work).
>>
>> QOS is just a 'request'.
>>
>> if you do this, also consider QOS on udp port 5060.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
>
>    * Certified SNORT Integrator
>    * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
>    * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
>    * Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
>    * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
> For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to