I'm still waiting for access as I recall.

On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:48:31 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
> And yet very few people go to the trouble to go to that wiki page and update
> 
> the information in it when they find it wrong.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> m...@grounded.net
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:39 AM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
> realistically be added after 4.2?
> 
>> Think: if that question was never ever ever asked again, how much noise
>> would it save on the mailing list?
>> 
> One more problem is definitely old information, such as wiki and other sipx
> related historical info.
> 
> I can't count how many times I've searched high and low only to find old
> information to go on. Sometimes it works out, other times it causes other
> problems. I've seen this countless times in the list, folks telling someone
> that they must have found old information.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/


_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to