I will have to ask my network engineer tomorrow what he did. Not my area of
expertise.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Scheidell <michael.scheid...@secnap.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:27:46
To: <mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] port 5060/ port 5080, proxy why?
just to conclude:
on cisco, you can tell it that if one certain source ip hits port 5060
on your public sip ip, it redirects it to the private ip on port 5080.
then EVERYONE else hitting port 5060 goes to the internal port 5060?
(I know pfsense can't do this nativity, I tried)
On 8/19/10 10:25 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote:
> I'm not sure what would work for your situation. I don't have this
> issue. I was just throwing an idea out there.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
