actually, if you are using 1:1 NAT, you might find the configuration much easier using a recent pfsense 2.0 snapshot, where you have much more granular control in outbound rules, etc.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > wrote: > I don't think you would need a second system "just" for this. Adding a > second system also means instituting HA mode, both would have to be proxies > (which is not a bad thing). Having asked the dev team before, it is not > possible to run sipxbridge as a standalone system "just" for SBC purposes, > it has to be HA. > > Patton and Audiocodes gateways both have survivability features. Please > also remember the "cost" of bandwidth for remote branches calling voicemail, > etc. There are certainly efficiencies in both type of deployments, I don't > pretend to suggest which one is better for a particular environment, as > everyone's needs are different. If your internet connection goes down, how > much functionality do the remote branches need? > > There should be no reason pfsense can't translate what you want: > > 1. Find out what Ip or CIDR's the ITSP will be communicating on. > 2. If source is <ITSP RANGE> and on port 5060, then send to sipx on port > 5080 > 3. If destination is <ITSP range> then make sure you use ip address > dedicated for itsp. > 4. Users come and go on different ip on port 5060, so they are not > affected,a and that is the public ip you assign dns records to. > > If you called voip.ms or did an online chat, you would also find that they > can do an IP based ACL in lieu of registration, but you cannot do this > online, they have always been flexible though we do not use them for any > other method except registration, though we use ITSP's that use IP based > ACL's only. > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Michael Scheidell < > michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote: > >> THANKS! possibly if I have the cisco rule I can transliterate it to >> pfsense or pf. >> >> >> >> >> On 8/19/10 10:31 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote: >> >> I will have to ask my network engineer tomorrow what he did. Not my area >> of expertise. >> >> >> -- >> Michael Scheidell, CTO >> o: 561-999-5000 >> d: 561-948-2259 >> ISN: 1259*1300 >> > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation >> >> - Certified SNORT Integrator >> - 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance >> - Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness >> - Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide >> - King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®. >> For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? > Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. > > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
