Because sipXecs works differently is the quick and dirty answer. There are options of putting a SBC in the DMZ that is more open to remote NAT issues.
Mike On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Smith <mb11...@telenet.be> wrote: > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To: <5ff8e265c9fc0a9e59c397c856b70...@mail.gmail.com> > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <51461> > Message-ID: <c905.4c7f9...@forum.sipfoundry.org> > > > > Yes I'll investigate it with the provider, and VPN is always > a solution. > > But I ask myself why this is working with other PBX > software. I'll try with askozia (asterisk) this friday. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't. mpic...@gmail.com blog: http://www.sipxecs.info call: sip:mpic...@sipxecs.info <sip%3ampic...@sipxecs.info>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
