Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: <5ff8e265c9fc0a9e59c397c856b70...@mail.gmail.com> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <51633> Message-ID: <c9b1.4c875...@forum.sipfoundry.org>
Hi Douglas, Yes I have read the pages about NAT a couple of time, everything is good configured, and remote UA (the 10.10.10.249 not behind the buggy BBOX) is able to register correctly with a x-sipX-privcontact in the Active Registrations page, no audio issues at all. Joegen, 1. I'll post a the INVITE SDP this evening. But the phone on 10.10.10.249 (this one is behind a "good" firewall/NAT) works perfectly with phones inside the internal network (192.168.3.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24), no audio issues both way. The X-Lite (with use local IP address and ICE disabled) is problematic, the signaling is passing, but for example, if I hang up on the 10.10.10.249 (a C470IP for Siemens), X-Lite doesn't detect that I hung up and stay "on line". 2. Do you get the same result if the caller is not behind NAT? YES, from phone inside the internal network (192.168.3.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) with a remote worker behind the buggy bbox I got one way audio issues. Regards, _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
