On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) <dwor...@avaya.com> wrote: > ________________________________________ > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Talbot, Peter > [peter.tal...@nrtnortheast.com] > > shouldn’t SBC1 be trying to send that traffic off to SIPX1 based on DNS SRV > Records? > ________________________________________ > > Possibly so. But you haven't shown us that the request was routed via TCP. > If it was routed via UDP, the _sip._udp records would control the request > routing. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
Does HA actually support a sipxbridge "only" role? I am under the impression a PROXY role must be attached in order for HA to work, even with no users directly created under it. I don't think it does. I think I have asked this question before about a standalone SBC using sipxbridge, and this is the understanding I took away from it. Someone correct me if I am wrong. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
