this thread just wont die

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Michael Picher <mpic...@ezuce.com> wrote:
> Trunk != extension...
>
> And remote small site connectivity here in the US isn't always cheap and
> reliable.  Plus he's talking about a completely separate entity.
>
> On Sep 14, 2011 5:40 AM, <pscheep...@epo.org> wrote:
>> My view on the world: Simplicity for an extra 4 extensions (as in "4
>> trunks") in a remote location can be achieved without an extra SipX.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Good points Todd.
>>
>> One of my favorite sayings... "simplicity breeds reliability."
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Todd Hodgen <thod...@frontier.com> wrote:
>> Mike, You've entertained that discussion on several occasions during the
>> past. From my perspective you are so focused on a single box solution for
>> whatever reason, you miss the important part of it - creating a reliable
>> platform for voice. Over the years, it's no secret that those that run
>> data networks would love to have as reliable a network as those that run
>> voice networks. The idea is to make the voice network reliable, and not a
>> victim to firewall software issues, or other nonsense that takes away from
>> that.
>>
>> Surely, this beast is complex enough for you, is it not. Why make it more
>> complex and unreliable.
>>
>> Leave the router as a router. Leave the firewall as a firewall, leave the
>> voice server as a voice server, and leave your entire network reliable.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
>> m...@grounded.net
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:36 PM
>> To: sipx-users
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Shared trunks between servers
>>
>> Hijack the thread, it's all useful information anyhow. However,
>> practically
>> everything mentioned is overkill :).
>> It's just a remote 4 trunk sipx setup which will use G.729 so there won't
>> be
>> much bandwidth involved.
>>
>> Using SIP trunks is the simplest install but I'd love to test a vpn back
>> to
>> the main office from this remote to let it get trunks from the mediant
>> directly. That only entails a low bandwidth vpn using pfsense.
>>
>> I've never set up a vpn using pfsense but it sure would have been nice to
>> do
>> something directly off of the sipx server in order to eliminate another
>> box
>> in the mix.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Picher
>> eZuce
>> Director of Technical Services
>> O.978-296-1005 X2015
>> M.207-956-0262
>> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
>> www.ezuce.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>



-- 
======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833

Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://support.myitdepartment.net
Blog:
http://blog.myitdepartment.net

Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
Ask about our Internet faxservices!
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to