Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since PRI is an ISDN standard, what is the non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI? What is it exactly?
Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually fed via a T1 with SIP trunks on it? If it is, its still a PRI, conforming to the PRI standards, as it should. I believe what you are referring to is some companies marketing name they use for a service they provide. I don't think anyone is giving you grief, we just have no idea what you are talking about since we haven't had the pleasure of reading the material you have, and really haven't a clue what this VPRI is. -----Original Message----- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:02 PM To: sipx-users Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:20:57 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > I dont know VPRI means. If you use terms noone but you might > understand you might explain it a bit. Throwing that aside... When I don't use the right terms, I get grief and when I use the terms I'm seeing in docs, I still get grief :). I would have called it Virtual PRI but flowroute itself seems to call it VPRI for short. > flowroute is a two-edged sword: Use the bandwidth.com template and > change the bandwidth.com gateway stuff to your flowroute gateway. make > sure flowroute is swet to send to your ip address and port 5080. Very simple. I'll take a look at this. > If you use dual wan with flowroute you may have issues if you route > netblocks or providers via specific wan ports. Flowroute will be the only gateway these sipx servers will know and have. > flowroute does not control > the majority of their network and hence, RTP does not come from the > same IP as the gateway. You pretty much have to open everything to use > flowroute if you had been in locked down mode. I didn't know this about them and to date, have always used an IP allow rule for them. Guess I've been lucky, haven't heard of any missed calls. These servers won't have any remote users but I wanted to have a bit of security in place so figured I would block all but sip.flowroute.com. Now I seem to have a new problem. Mike > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:10 PM, m...@grounded.net <m...@grounded.net> > wrote: >> I need to install 4 separate sipx systems in four separate locations. >> No interoffice communications. > All of the sipx systems could benefit from the use of a VPRI rather > than traditional. > > I use ITSP's for individual lines when we need an area code that our > local telco cannot handle. > On sipx, I usually just create an ITSP device in the gateway section > and let it authenticate via user name/password. > > In this case, due to the number of lines per server (4 to 8), it > doesn't seem like a good idea to authenticate each and every DID > individually for example and would prefer using an IP based > authentication for the whole server. > > >> I'll be using flowroute for the systems but am not sure how to >> configure sipx to authenticate once based on IP over a user >> name/password. I don't see anything which would allow me to do this >> in the Gateway configuration section. >> > >> Can someone shed some light on this please. >> > Thanks very much. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
