<sigh>
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:55:11 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote: > Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since PRI is an ISDN standard, what is the > non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI? What is it > exactly? > > Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually fed via a T1 > with SIP trunks on it? If it is, its still a PRI, conforming to the PRI > standards, as it should. > > I believe what you are referring to is some companies marketing name they > use for a service they provide. I don't think anyone is giving you grief, > we just have no idea what you are talking about since we haven't had the > pleasure of reading the material you have, and really haven't a clue what > this VPRI is. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of > m...@grounded.net > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:02 PM > To: sipx-users > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:20:57 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >> I dont know VPRI means. If you use terms noone but you might >> understand you might explain it a bit. Throwing that aside... >> > When I don't use the right terms, I get grief and when I use the terms I'm > seeing in docs, I still get grief :). > I would have called it Virtual PRI but flowroute itself seems to call it > VPRI for short. > >> flowroute is a two-edged sword: Use the bandwidth.com template and >> change the bandwidth.com gateway stuff to your flowroute gateway. make >> sure flowroute is swet to send to your ip address and port 5080. Very > simple. > > I'll take a look at this. > >> If you use dual wan with flowroute you may have issues if you route >> netblocks or providers via specific wan ports. >> > Flowroute will be the only gateway these sipx servers will know and have. > >> flowroute does not control >> the majority of their network and hence, RTP does not come from the >> same IP as the gateway. You pretty much have to open everything to use >> flowroute if you had been in locked down mode. >> > I didn't know this about them and to date, have always used an IP allow rule > for them. > Guess I've been lucky, haven't heard of any missed calls. > > These servers won't have any remote users but I wanted to have a bit of > security in place so figured I would block all but sip.flowroute.com. Now I > seem to have a new problem. > > Mike > > >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:10 PM, m...@grounded.net <m...@grounded.net> >> wrote: >>> I need to install 4 separate sipx systems in four separate locations. >>> No interoffice communications. >> All of the sipx systems could benefit from the use of a VPRI rather >> than traditional. >> >> I use ITSP's for individual lines when we need an area code that our >> local telco cannot handle. >> On sipx, I usually just create an ITSP device in the gateway section >> and let it authenticate via user name/password. >> >> In this case, due to the number of lines per server (4 to 8), it >> doesn't seem like a good idea to authenticate each and every DID >> individually for example and would prefer using an IP based >> authentication for the whole server. >> >> >>> I'll be using flowroute for the systems but am not sure how to >>> configure sipx to authenticate once based on IP over a user >>> name/password. I don't see anything which would allow me to do this >>> in the Gateway configuration section. >>> >> >>> Can someone shed some light on this please. >>> >> Thanks very much. >> >> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
