> BTW: Sometimes replies can hurt, but > learning comes at a price, better a painful answer then no answer, > get over the pain and learn from people > that went through some pain to get to a certain knowledge level.
Baloney, learning does NOT have to come at the price of being insulted every time one posts. There is no need for know it all attitudes in an open source project unless all you want are know it all people taking part. You are so wrong friend. > BTW2: And now we know that VPRI is a > stupid word for SIP-trunk, thanks for the info. I guess you are showing your true colors here also. Thanks for your, um, input. > Paul > >> >> On Friday, December 30, 2011, Gerald Harper <ger...@sustaa.com> > wrote: >>> Yup realized right after I clicked send. Oh well. (can't we all > just get >>> along?) >>> >> >> Well let's see - on one hand we have Tony and Todd's contributions >> >> and replies to list that are very helpful without question (even >> sometimes they could hurt feelings). On the other hand you're >> watching the list and reply offline to others saying that it sucks >> >> and calls are dropped (btw is there any jira opened, trace collected >> so we could take a look at?) and you ended by not recommending >> SipXecs to customers. As a project contributor I don't feel this is >> >> the right attitude for an open source project and I encourage you > to >> become active in reporting issues instead just watching mailing list >> and hope something it is solved >> >> Thanks >> George >> >> >>> On 12/29/2011 8:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: >>>> Your post went to the list... >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Gerald Harper<ger...@sustaa.com> >>>> Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >>>> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:51:36 >>>> To:<m...@grounded.net> Discussion list for users of > sipXecs software< >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> >>>> Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >>>> <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication >>>> >>>> Off list (so as not to piss anyone off)... you are so right > about how >>>> people are treated on this list. One of the reasons I stopped > posting >>>> here and recommending sipx to customers. The other being > the random >>>> dropped calls issue from two years ago, I follow the list > only to see if >>>> the problem has been fixed. Neither have IMHO. >>>> >>>> I hope it all works for you, and by the way I knew what you > meant as >>>> soon as I read it. >>>> >>>> On 12/29/2011 8:12 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: >>>>>> Sigh what? Mike, read about PRI - >>>>> Sigh... because you took the time to agree with Tony, > giving me >> grief while at the same time pointing out that you were not doing >> >> that. Of course you were. Since Tony had already made his point, why >> did you need to bring it up again? >> >>>>> You then post a separate reply to the original question > when >> just before that, you told me you didn't know what I was talking about. >> >>>>> Sigh because as soon as I point out the obvious such > as I am now >> having to do, a few of you must at all costs have fun with this, >> turning the persons post into garbage making points like 'we need > to >> understand'. Does someone else feel the need still? >> >>>>> Of course you know what I was asking about, I've seen > plenty of >> people talking about virtual PRI's. Who the heck would not know that >> a VPRI might simply be an abbreviation. Doesn't seem to be at the >> >> moment but give it time maybe :). >> >>>>> Bottom line is that there are a few old timers on this > list that >> seem to feel the need to be hard nosed to people. Why? Maybe a few >> >> of the users are simply too freaking serious for no good reason. >> Give it a rest. There is no reason to be like that with ANYONE on > this list. >>>>> No one makes you reply to anything, you don't have to. > If you >> don't like how someone posts something, it's not your place to be >> >> the teacher or know it all and tell them how they need to learn >> everything about VoIP before ever taking the chance of using the >> wrong term while asking a question. God forbid! >> >>>>>> That's all I'm saying, and I think that is >>>>>> what Tony was asking - what is it exactly. >>>>> A virtual PRI is really just a billing method for a SIP > trunk. >> Figured pretty much anyone on this list would know that. >>>>> The question really was, how do I set up sipx so that > I can use >> IP authentication to the ITSP over user/password. >> >>>>> Anyways, moving on... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >>>>>> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] > On Behalf Of >>>>>> m...@grounded.net >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:08 PM >>>>>> To: sipx-users >>>>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication >>>>>> >>>>>> <sigh> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:55:11 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote: >>>>>>> Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since > PRI is an ISDN standard, what is >>>>>> the >>>>>>> non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual > PRI? What is it >>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that > is actually >> fed via a T1 >>>>>>> with SIP _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
