Douglas Hubler <dhub...@ezuce.com> wrote on 25-05-2012 01:52:58:

> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Gerald Drouillard
> <gerryl...@drouillard.ca> wrote:
> >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> > I think you can get as crazy as you want with this.  I believe the
> > ultimate in interfaces for managing the services on the server is
> > webmin.  It is very rare that you cannot do anything you want within 
webmin.
> 
> then we should make sure webmin works.  Did you typically install
> webmin on sipxecs systems before or just thinking ahead?

I think it is important that there is at least also a UC interface where
the important things for the UC system can be set. Like certain DHCP 
options.
 
> 
> > You
> > just cannot take over being the DHCP server without going in and
> > shutting it off on whatever else is on the network.  I can see a lot 
of
> > people bringing down their network without knowing what they are 
doing.
> > I think the current 4.4 way is the correct way of doing it.
> 
> y, dhcpd is off by default
>
> > The page
> > that goes out and looks at the current settings on the network is 
good.
> >   If you don't know how to change your current DNS or DHCP server then
> > you should get assistance from somebody that does before installing a
> > phone server.  It is only going to get harder when their firewall is 
not
> > working either.
> 
> 
> 
> > I think we have to be careful on who we are targeting
> > on the "install" phase.
> 
> install is trivial now.  it's about what you enable.  so far it's been
> a much better experience.  you can ramp up services once you get a
> certain level of the install.  it's better than have acd stats service
> failing after install when you don't even plan to run a call center.
> 
> > There is no harm in the server being configure to be a DNS and ntp
> > server for the UC devices.  But that can be misleading as those 
settings
> > can be superseded by the "real" DHCP server on the network.
> 
> The DNS doesn't have to be the same that your entire company uses.  I
> cannot find a good reason not to run the DNS.

IP address management is a reason why the "company DNS" should at least 
reflect 
the A records of IP addresses that are used.

Running your own "UC DNS" means handing out a different DNS server address 
to UC devices.
This is difficult, especially when they run on the Desk/Laptop (it's 
impossible).
That would mean all office devices use the "UC DNS"

> 
> > Don't forget all the option settings in dhcp like:
> > sip-servers-name
> > boot-server
> > "Dynamic DNS reverse domain" and "Dynamic DNS domain name" could also
> > come into play for both DNS and dhcp.
> 
> everything is available via a template to we're definitely looking for
> feedback for some real world systems
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to