I used the same method that I used to register 301 for 302.
Being registered for 301 should have no effect on registering for 302. -> If by
any chance the 301 setting is not completely unregister, can 302 be registered
on the same softphone? As, after executing uninitialize process, and trying to
register new sip setting, i keep on getting 401 error. I've check the settings
(realm, password etc), all are correct.
I'm developing my own softphone by using sipxtapi.dll. I'm afraid I missed
lines codes which are used in SipXEzphone that enable the process of
reinitializing new sip setting without having to stop and rerun the program.
Please advise.
Regards,
Zam(ielia)
----- Original Message ----
From: Dale R. Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SipXtapi-dev <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 6:31:41 AM
Subject: Re: [sipxtapi-dev] Logout function in SipXtapi
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 00:29 -0800, zamie zamie wrote:
> Does that mean I did not unregister my 301 setting completely, hence
> 302 failed to be registered?
>
> Have tested many times, my uninitilize and re-initialize will only
> work if I perform the process on the same extension setting.
Being registered for 301 should have no effect on registering for 302.
Have you gotten it to register for 302 alone? Perhaps the credentials
for 302 are not set up.
Dale
_______________________________________________
sipxtapi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now.
_______________________________________________
sipxtapi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
