Hi all,

it seems that someone is agree with me and someone is not about the solution to
add the pre-release of rsync (3.0.0pre4) into the stable branch of SystemImager
and tag the new 4.0.2 stable ASAP (4.0.1, since ".1" is odd, is reserved for
development pre-releases).

So, probably this is the first polling in these lists :-), don't know, but I
would really like to know opinion of the community about this issue.

The fact is that the current stable release of SystemImager 4.0.0 is not
"stable" enough: there is a bug that occurs with rsync when it's built on a
machine with a kernel >= 2.6.22 (that's actually my build server) and the
installing client uses a kernel < 2.6.22:

See http://www.systemimager.org:8000/trac.systemimager.org/ticket/6 for details,
many thanks to Rochus Schmid for reporting this bug.

The proposed solutions for now are:

1) use the pre-release of rsync that seems to fix the problem and tag
SystemImager 4.0.2, leaving the 4.0.0 packages as they are, let me say that I
would just proceed like the kernel guys do if there's a bug in the kernel (just
leave all the previous released kernels "forzen" and available for download in
any case, and always release new versions in case of errors/bugs)

2) remove the old 4.0.0 packages from SF.net (let me say "close" them to the
users), rebuild all the packages in a build server with a kernel < 2.6.22 and
then release the new packages using the same version number: 4.0.0

3) rebuild the packages in a build server with a kernel < 2.6.22 and changing
the version number to 4.0.2, leaving 4.0.0 packages as they are on SF.net

4) other ideas are welcome...

I vote for 1).

-Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Reply via email to