Patrick Dowler wrote: > On 2007-11-8 10:32, Andrea Righi wrote: >>> Since rysnc is generally supplied by the linux distribution separately, I >>> would not like to see SI require something that will conflict with what >>> is provided by the base system. That's a headache and will just leave a >>> lot of users back at SI 3.9.x until their distro goes to rsync 3. For >>> fedora (which we use), that means a new release (at least f8, maybe f9) >>> as they would not put it into an existing release as an update (if I >>> understand the policy, and the policy is why we use fedora). >> There's a misunderstanding here... using rsync 3.0.0pre4 wouldn't introduce >> any additional requirements. It will be only used by systemimager itself to >> build the initrd_template and the BOEL initrd.img (read: it'll be >> automatically shipped into the systemimager initrd). > > Ah, I get it. The rsync3 is packaged into the autoinstall system. Would > getimage/updateclient continue to use the system rsync?
Yes. -Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
