Aimee, maybe in the future but currently it's for a smaller branch that will eventually get merged in and go live. I suggest reading up btw, it's tough to assume good faith when people pushing this even admit that they're being sneaky and underhanded trying to get this in the back door.
-Gordon On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Aimee Trescothick < [email protected]> wrote: > > On 30 Apr 2009, at 02:57, Gordon Wendt wrote: > > > ... I resent this being pushed through the back door. There are > > still legitimate ways to do this without sneaking in through a > > little heard of (outside of this list) branch of the viewer and > > trying to do this reflects very poorly on the ethics of both the > > people supporting this attempt and the Lindens who are supporting it. > > Please lets not blow this out of proportions and insinuate there's > anything underhand going on here, there isn't, no one is sneaking > around or hiding anything. This branch is intended to be the front > door, the main route for Open Source contributions in future, it's > only little known right now as this will be the first cycle. > > Aimee. >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
