I think rendering limits are inevitable, resources tend not to be unlimited. There will be disagreements regarding rendering prioritizations/limits ... this is to be expected. Perhaps one approach would be to see how much pain is inflicted on the community if a limit is imposed. If most don't even notice it, then it's probably a proper rendering limitation...which would then qualify as an 'optimization'. One thing is very helpful though, and think Soft has done some of it already, is to publish these limitations and how it impacts rendering (must be easier for LL to initiate that than the community). *forgive me * if this is published somewhere already, may be share the link.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Soft<[email protected]> wrote: > Try creating a 128x128 sculpted prim, then link 255 of those together > in a 16x16 grid (remove one to make 255). Then scale them down as far > as they'll go and wear it like a badge. You should start to see some > prims in the set vanish. > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Ambrosia<[email protected]> wrote: >> This is news to me as well. Rendering limits? Which? I personally have >> not noticed anything that I might recognize as a new rendering limit? >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 16:02, Harleen Gretzky<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Can you elaborate on what the new rendering limits are? > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -- Rameshsharma Ramloll PhD Research Assistant Professor Idaho State University, PocatelloTel: 208-282-5333 More info at http://tr.im/RRamloll _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
