Ok, in the meantime I came to the conclusion that it would be a good chance to move slide to TLP. I started to restructure the svn-repository on my personal server. I try to split the slide project into several subprojects (webdavclient, webdavserver, commandline, testsuite...), so that the individual components could be released separately. I hope to get it running with Maven 2.0 so that we are able to update the website and prepare releases more easily. I don't know how much time I can afford to work on Slide in the future, so any help is appreciated. Once I'm done I can provide a user/pwd for anybody interested to have a look at my proposed repository layout. Cheers, Daniel
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im > Auftrag von Max Pfingsthorn > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 11:04 > An: Slide Developers Mailing List > Betreff: RE: TLP... :) > > Hello! > > Yes, please, that would be great! I think it would come /almost/ for free > from the earlier proposed restructuring of the code. The Store should > maybe be reworked a little for easier implementations.. > > Best regards, > > Max Pfingsthorn > > Hippo > > Oosteinde 11 > 1017WT Amsterdam > The Netherlands > Tel +31 (0)20 5224466 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.hippo.nl > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stéphane Croisier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:34 > > To: Slide Developers Mailing List > > Subject: Re: TLP... :) > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > If you make some cross-links between other Apache > > DAV initatives (aka Jackrabbit), it seems they > > now plan to make a separate WebDAV server on top > > of the JCR170 RI (cf forward of the yesterday > > thread). Does it not look like the basis for a > > new Slide 3.0 or for a new "generic" WebDAV > > Apache TLP project which would try to gather all > > the DAV efforts and initatives toghether rather > > than splitting the (scarce and sporadic) existing DAV ressources? > > > > My 2 cts. > > Stéphane > > > > > > >Subject: webdav server(s) > > >Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:12:08 -0800 > > >To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >I think I understand now the disjoint thoughts on how the jcr-server > > >should be designed. The existing jcr-server is a webdav view of a > > >JCR repository, whereas it seems Brian is looking for a general > > >webdav server that happens to use JCR as its storage interface. > > >The reason for the confusion is because JCR and WebDAV do not share > > >the same hierarchical models -- either one can emulate the other, > > >but they are not the same. > > > > > >What I suggest is that we start a separate contrib project for a > > >general webdav server implemented using JCR and see how much of > > >the code can be shared between the two, gradually merging them > > >together until we reach a point where the two are (hopefully) > > >distinguishable only by configuration files. What do you think > > >of that as a plan? > > > > > >....Roy > > > > > > > > > > - -- --- -----=[ scroisier2 at jahia dot com ]=---- --- -- - > > www.jahia.org : The Java Unified Web Platform > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
