>> ...1. A XML pipeline is expressed as a W3C XProc [2] file with "xpl" >> extension.... > > Is this "xpl" extension standard? > If you're choosing your own I'd prefer not having an L at the end as > it's too easy to confuse with a I. > Maybe "xpr" or even "xproc", clearer?
This has been extracted from the XProc candidate recomendation [1]. Literally: "The media type for pipeline documents is application/xml. Often, pipeline documents are identified by the extension .xpl." I suppose we are not forced to use this extension but IMHO it could be a good idea to stay in line with the recomendation. Anyway, we can support both of them. >> ...If you are agree with this approach, I´d like grabbing the stuff into >> trunk >> after adding some unit testing... > > +1 > >> ...The question is, where?, "bundles/scripting" or "contrib/scripting"?. > > We recently said "everything new initially goes under contrib", I > think that's good in this case. > Although very useful, this is not core Sling functionality. Agreed. BR, Juanjo.
