The size of Midori vs "any other" browser is meaningless if Midori doesn't work
right. Midori as implemented in 3.0 doesn't work right.
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Dennis Hodapp <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Dennis Hodapp <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Midori web browser
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 2:00 AM
Midori is still nearly 10 times smaller than Seamonky which is around 30MB :/
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Terry Maiden <[email protected]> wrote:
How about Seamonkey? Would it make a good substitute for Midori or Firefox?
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Allan Pinto <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Allan Pinto <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Midori web browser
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 12:09 AM
> i had made a slitaz live cd (2.0
> based i think ) with qt and Arora and
> GNS3 and python came to 35 mb ( no firefox), it was a
> long time back
> and i dont remember much what i added and did not. but if
> any else is
> interested in checking out the pkglist your welcome.
> http://www.in2dwok.com/downloads/dynatazgns.iso,
> if i remember correctly Arora could not open gmail or any
> ssl based
> sites, must have changed by now.
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Fred J. Stephens <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dennis Hodapp <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Would konqueror not work? Or Arora? Both are very
> good browsers.
> > Konqueror would huge QT libs. Aurora is also QT based
> I think. Would
> > add too much size to Slitaz probably.
> >
> > ---
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanx and regd's.
>
> Allan.
> http://www.in2dwok.com
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
