Looks like some of your packages are not getting all the depends. I really thing you need a full cooking list. Like it goes down the line of every depend and build_depends. To see that util-linux-ng is not build or package yet and then trys to build it. Before building like xorg-libXt or something.
PS Looks like xorg-libSM needed util-linux-ng. Thats what casues the chain of failed packages. On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Christopher Rogers <[email protected]>wrote: > Sorry just we never thought of remove in before. I guess we should add them > to the files.list file. > > I never thinking of these things cause i use frugal livecd install on my > hard drive. > > I have you source DVD in mind, it's why I added your function, >> > > The source dvd should a mirror of tank of sort. It needs to be able to do > the following: > > 1) Have packages and incoming folder as repos. This is so we can use tazpkg > get-install for your own packages instead of some half ass tazpkg install. I > say that cause just install the -dev is not enough. Just do this: > tazpkg setup-mirror $packages packages > tazpkg setup-mirror $incoming incoming > echo "incoming" > $DB/priority > echo "packages" > $DB/priority > echo "main" > $DB/priority > > > 2) add lzma to $SETUP_PKGS. This so we can recompress packages and make > repos files.list.lzma. > > 3) add a clean build option. I say this only so we could at least have the > option of building in a clean system with out gtk and xorg. I know you say > there used for most packages but there is change that some packages will not > build right using $SETUP_PKGS. > > I hope this helps. > > > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Christophe Lincoln <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> > Yes. It likes saves 5mb off of python. >> > >> > PS I don't want a frame war. But what was the point of the source dvd >> > if you can't compile everything from scratch locally without internet? >> >> I have you source DVD in mind, it's why I added your function, but you >> dont anser to my question, do we want untracked files and leave user >> filesystem all messy ? >> >> Should we not find a better solution like creating a list of them >> before remove, include it in the package and let tazpkg handle it ? >> >> - Christophe >> >> --- >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >> >> >
