On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Scott Marlowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > IS the logswitch_finish() command an acceptable method for forcing the > replication engine to switch from 2 to 1 so I can vacuum full 2? >
i think that is what slony execute internally to make the switch, so i think is safe to execute it... and after that sl_log_1 will be truncated for slony so no vacuuming needed -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
