On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Jan Wieck <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/21/2010 2:38 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: >> >> So, I had a query that blocked all updates going out of the sl_log_2 >> table, and it's 13Gig. sl_log_1 is empty. >> >> IS the logswitch_finish() command an acceptable method for forcing the >> replication engine to switch from 2 to 1 so I can vacuum full 2? > > It is completely safe to call logswitch_finish() at any time. It may or may > not actually do something. > > In your case, I presume the value of sl_log_status is 2. This means it is > waiting for sl_log_2 to become empty and once that happens, it will truncate > it and set sl_log_status to 0.
So, if I let the system just sit quiescent for a while, it should straighten things out? _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
