On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Jaime Casanova <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Scott Marlowe <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> IS the logswitch_finish() command an acceptable method for forcing the >> replication engine to switch from 2 to 1 so I can vacuum full 2? >> > > i think that is what slony execute internally to make the switch, so i > think is safe to execute it... and after that sl_log_1 will be > truncated for slony so no vacuuming needed >
sorry, slony will truncate sl_log_2 obviously... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
