On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 06:57:05PM -0400, Steve Singer wrote: > Gurjeet Singh wrote: > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Steve Singer <[email protected] > > > One of our customers is looking to deploy this in an almost unattended > > environment, and having memory leaks in Slon will most definitely hurt > > their ability to deploy it with confidence. > > > > I would prefer to see the patch incorporated in 2.0.4 and have people > > test the RC1 than have it included after 2.0.4 in the hopes that people > > would test the CVS version. > > What do others think?
I think the right thing to do is fix the leak and if needed, roll more RCs. It's already asking a lot of people to test RCs. Asking people to pull from some random SCM system and test that will trim that already tiny group. > I take it your offering to give the leak memory hanges a good workout > before we tag 2.0.4 final? I suspect I can find people who will :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [email protected] iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
