On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Jan Wieck <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 6/1/2010 9:31 AM, Steve Singer wrote:
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> >> On 5/28/2010 6:57 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> (A version of 2.0.4 RC1 + these changes can be found at
> >>> http://github.com/ssinger/slony/tree/203_memfixes_UlrichWeber)
> >>
> >> Is that the memory leak from not freeing notifications? If so, let's
> >> test it with bombarding a slon with a gazillion notifies and if it
> >> survives, put it into 2.0.4.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > The patch frees memory in a number of places including the cleanup
> > thread and during the set copy.  You can view the patch at the above URL.
> >
> > The 1.2 version of the patch also removed the notify stuff (but that
> > wasn't required with 2.0 the code was removed).   If we are happy with
> > things we should apply it to 1.2 as well for the next time we do a 1.2.x
> > release.
>
> After a detailed line by line review of the patch, Steve and I decided
> to commit it for 2.0.4.
>
>
Thank you :)

-- 
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh.gurj...@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to