On 5/28/2010 6:57 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > Gurjeet Singh wrote: >> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Steve Singer <[email protected] > >> One of our customers is looking to deploy this in an almost unattended >> environment, and having memory leaks in Slon will most definitely hurt >> their ability to deploy it with confidence. >> >> I would prefer to see the patch incorporated in 2.0.4 and have people >> test the RC1 than have it included after 2.0.4 in the hopes that people >> would test the CVS version. > > What do others think? > > I take it your offering to give the leak memory hanges a good workout > before we tag 2.0.4 final? > > > (A version of 2.0.4 RC1 + these changes can be found at > http://github.com/ssinger/slony/tree/203_memfixes_UlrichWeber)
Is that the memory leak from not freeing notifications? If so, let's test it with bombarding a slon with a gazillion notifies and if it survives, put it into 2.0.4. Jan -- Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
