On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Stuart Bishop <[email protected]> wrote: >> That suggests to me there being some value to having some sort of "fail >> if not sufficiently up to date" command. > > Pretty much all my canned scripts start by issuing a sync and waiting > for it. I think it is dangerous to do otherwise. Failing with a > meaningful error rather than leaving sysadmins staring at a blinking > prompt would be preferable.
Nice. What does this look like in the script? _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
