On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:50:12AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > I think every year I've talked about Slony at PGCon or similar, there > has been a brief discussion about 2PC, which hasn't headed towards "we > want to use it."
My experience was slightly different: the discussion of 2PC always tended towards, "Gee, it'd be nice to get that functionality just in case you need it." Of course, that boils down to the Do What I Mean protocol, which is a current bugbear for me over in my day job, so maybe I'm just inclined to hear that everywhere. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
