I don't use WAIT all that much, but I know that it's necessary for some actions--namely, FAIL OVER, in which I've encountered some race conditions in the past that were resolved with a WAIT and SYNC. It'd be nice to have WAIT built-in to some of the slonik functions.
--Richard On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Vick Khera <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Stuart Bishop <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> That suggests to me there being some value to having some sort of "fail > >> if not sufficiently up to date" command. > > > > Pretty much all my canned scripts start by issuing a sync and waiting > > for it. I think it is dangerous to do otherwise. Failing with a > > meaningful error rather than leaving sysadmins staring at a blinking > > prompt would be preferable. > > Nice. What does this look like in the script? > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general >
_______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
