Sure, I'm interested on hopping on the bandwagon to support large 
companies' demand for cheap, poor quality connectivity solutions in order 
to increase profit margins of unaware consumers.  Might as well sell them 
to individual consumers while we're at it, right?

Anthony, I worked on the helpdesk of a large Australian ISP for about a 
year and a half and was considered to be one of the modem experts there.  I 
remember being the primary escalation point for all "winmodem" issues when 
they suddenly appeared in the masses when the big names started shipping 
them out.  I remember it not being uncommon to spend two hours (or more) on 
such an escalated call due to the poor quality of the equipment involved 
and the number of times something would appear to fix the problem only five 
minutes later the connection would crap out and require more config changes 
in order to get it to connect again, only to see the same result.

Sure, you save a lot of money on building the "modem"... then you leave 
ISPs to pick up the cost when their customers spend hours on the phone 
requiring support.  Then there's the cost to the customer - they must waste 
their time and money chasing after support, and ultimately they end up 
frustrated and angry, often taking this out on whatever unfortunate 
helpdesker happened to pick up the call.  Nice how such companies treat 
their customers.  Is Dynalink one of these companies?

It is interesting that you use the word "cheap" rather than inexpensive in 
your email, and I have yet to see a softmodem that would fit the latter 
rather than the former.  I'm sure there are many people who would perfer a 
PCI modem over an external, but I don't want some "cheap" crap that's going 
to bomb out on me at any time, as it seems softmodems have a habit of 
doing.  I don't want "cheap", I want reliable and dependable - I have yet 
to see a software based modem that fits this need.  Somehow I doubt that 
Dynalink has come up with the answer.

Alexander Else
http://cyberchrist.org

At 12:41 PM 4/7/00 +1000, Anthony Espinola wrote:
>Dear Slug Members
>
>Dynalink Modems new PCI Modem is now Linux Ready. (1456VQH-T2)
>
>Linux PCI Modem for Redhat is now available,   and we  would like the 
>Linux community to know about it.
>
>We  are interested in hearing from you guys for your opinion on a PCI 
>modem for Linux,  OPEN SOURCE Code will be available,  and we want to 
>offer a couple of "samples" to the right Linux users to  test and to give 
>us an idea on what you think of the product.
>
>Are you guys interested in a cheap  modem solution for Linux ?
>
>Would many users prefer a Linux PCI modem over a external Hardware modem / 
>ISA Hardware modem ?
>
>What Distro of Linux would require OPEN SOURCE code,  what Distro do SLUG 
>users use ?
>
>If anyone has any questions / suggestions please,  email me at 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] or look at our Web Site www.dynalink.com.au
>Regards,
>
>Anthony Espinola ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Dynalink Modems Technician / RM Manager
>
>Visit our web site www.dynalink.com.au
>
>--
>SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
>To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>unsubscribe in the text

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text

Reply via email to