-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've got a client that wants to set up for the web, and they've got a
"friend" that claims they should go NT over anything else, claiming
it's the most secure way with the exception of 4 $$$ os'es. The
"friend" also claims to have set up the security for Aust Post,
something I'm just a little doubtful of :-)
What I really want to do is to provide examples of how NT is less
secure (and actual holes) but how Linux doesn't have those same
insecurities. Can anyone help me out with this?
Aussie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Comment: Please verify this signature. http://www.pgpi.com
iQA/AwUBORTDkJZb9oayhFBBEQLTGQCgkfIWLOSi+TiRyYX6knxtxrxa/yAAn2UJ
6nBkJSgd7zmhSd8w68AuAwSh
=Z2L2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
PGP Key Block available at:
http://aussie.mine.nu/aussie/pgp_key.txt
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
