> I've got a client that wants to set up for the web, and they've got a
> "friend" that claims they should go NT over anything else, claiming
> it's the most secure way with the exception of 4 $$$ os'es. The
> "friend" also claims to have set up the security for Aust Post,
> something I'm just a little doubtful of :-)
You got a name? A friend of mines father works high up in Aust Post IT,
infact i beleive Mr Hack (dont laugh) may infact be the head honcho. Im
sure i can quickly find out for you =)
How do you define "set up the security". I mean, i commented out ftp on
a inetd config files... =)
> What I really want to do is to provide examples of how NT is less
> secure (and actual holes) but how Linux doesn't have those same
> insecurities. Can anyone help me out with this?
Dean
--
Voltaire: 'I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight
to
the death to protect your right to say it'
BONG: http://bong.pnc.com.au
LANZAC: http://bong.pnc.com.au/lanzac
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 16867613
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
