> Firstly, slink is OLD. There is no question that potato versions of the > same software not only contain the security updates that were in slink, > but because potato is *newer*, other security holes will undoubtedly be > closed. I bet the authors of the year+ old software in slink aren't Why do you equate newer will less security holes ? Jason -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN marty
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Jason Rennie
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Michael Fox
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Thom May
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Chuck Dale
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on LWN Chuck Dale
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on ... James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame on ... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] [OT] Debian Flame... Chuck Dale