> Firstly, slink is OLD.  There is no question that potato versions of the
> same software not only contain the security updates that were in slink,
> but because potato is *newer*, other security holes will undoubtedly be
> closed.  I bet the authors of the year+ old software in slink aren't

Why do you equate newer will less security holes ?

Jason



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to