On Wed, 02 May 2001, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, getadog said:
> >I you're going the python route, then go the full monty:
> >www.zope.org.
> >
> >To list a few good points of zope, revision control, it will
> >allow multiple people to work on the site at once.
> >It will allow you to undo mistakes.
>
> cvs allows multiple people to work on the site, provides revision
> control. vims 'u' command allows you to undo mistakes.
>
> >It does require a bit more cpu, but you can stick it behind a
> >proxy to reduce the load, and it can cache dynamic pages for
> >a length of time that you set. (no need to consult the database
> >every hit when the database might only change a few times a day)
>
> To list a few bad points of Zope: It's huge, it requires a lot of
> machine resources, and having getting Zope to play nice with Apache is
> non-trivial (it likes to ignore the options its own documentation says
> to use to turn off listening to sockets).
Add to the list difficult interface for programmers to work with.
Difficult to learn.
Crap performance.
Non standard storage format. (ZODB)
(And yes I have used Zope and I do get it - doesn't make it any less crap)
Benno.mod_python.all.the.way
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
