Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Terry Dawson wrote:
There is a difference between telling people something and ensuring that
they understand it. Frankly, ticking a checkbox means nothing more than
than the user has read the message. That's important, but it's no proof
of understanding.
What I was getting at was that Facebook sent a message but changed
things without ensuring that the message had be received by the
recipient. For recipients who they could not confirm receipt of
the messages there should have no change.
I don't think "no change" was an option. How long do you realistically
wait? I suppose they figured that you hadn't logged in for two weeks you
probably didn't care. What if it had been twelve months, would that have
been better?
Terry
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
