On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Chris Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "By KDE developers", that's the keywords. Obviously as a counter > argument, 4.0.x is considered highly experimental in Debian (it's not > even in unstable, it's only in alioth/experimental). Well, KDE devs are the authority when it comes to KDE. Not Debian devs, Not Fedora devs :) The reason why KDE 4 is in alioth is because of Debian's policies, NOT KDE's or not because KDE 4 is that bad. > trying them. I'm just trying to straighten the issue of stability > (they meant differently to different people; what's stable for KDE > people might not be stable enough for workstation users or newbie > users) I tend to disagree. Knowing a few KDE devs personally, when they say it's stable, they've tried it on a few distributions are confident enough to call it stable. PS : I'm a Gnome user ;) -- Shyam Mani | http://xinetd.accosted.net/ Gentoo Dev | http://dev.gentoo.org/~fox2mike Email | [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key | 0xFDD0E345 _______________________________________________ Slugnet mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
