On 2012-09-03 17:22, Danny Auble wrote: > This is the 'batch' step and is intended.
I thought that the batch step has id_step = -2, but we are seeing (rarely, but still) rows where the job_db_inx of the step row is also -2.
On 2012-09-03 17:22, Danny Auble wrote: > This is the 'batch' step and is intended.
I thought that the batch step has id_step = -2, but we are seeing (rarely, but still) rows where the job_db_inx of the step row is also -2.