Hi Here are Slurm versions which we have used on our cluster with slurmdbd. We have been running 2.3.2 since 27 December 2011.
2.1.2 -> 2.1.4 -> 2.1.11 -> 2.2.1 -> 2.2.3 -> 2.2.4 -> 2.3.2 BR, Tommi --- On Tue, 9/4/12, Danny Auble <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Danny Auble <[email protected]> > Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: No foreign keys in slurm db? > To: "slurm-dev" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Tomi Pieviläinen" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012, 9:44 AM > > Tomi, What version of slurm are you using? I am also > assuming you are > using the slurmdbd as well. There is code in the > current version (2.4) > that prevents this from happening. It looks like this > code was added in > 2.3.2 patch a3bb2409. If you are using a current > version it would be > interesting if there are any logs you have during the times > of these bad > job_db_inx's. Do you happen to have any job_db_inx in > your job table > that has a -2 or is it only in the step table? > > Danny > > On 09/03/12 23:31, Tomi Pieviläinen wrote: > > On 2012-09-03 17:22, Danny Auble wrote: > >> This is the 'batch' step and is intended. > > I thought that the batch step has id_step = -2, but we > are seeing > > (rarely, but still) rows where the job_db_inx of the > step row is also -2. >
