What does that filter rule look like exactly?

What would an IP-ARP packet look like?  Is it coming into 192.168.1.255
(in my case)?  Would it be addressed to the gateway itself
(192.169.1.1)?  Is it a different protocol?

I would like to continue blocking broadcast pings from the client, but
not at the cost of losing connectivity...duh??

Thanks!

Sully


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] We've just about had it

Agreed - we block everything except IP and IP-ARP and it works for
everything we can think of.

Michael



----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] We've just about had it


> Mark, broadcast is required for ARP request and if the client do not
get
> response back from the gateway, so that could be problem.
>
> Alex
> sB Tech Support
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark P. Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 12:02 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] We've just about had it
>
>
> Just to add my really quick 2 cents.
>
> I have had 30 units online since January...with all working superbly.
1.
> I use only static IPs (both sB unit and client computer on same
> subnet)
> 2. I do not use any grounding.
>
> I am in the process of deploying 30 more (newly acquired) units.  I
will
> let you know if I run into any problems.
>
> Side Note: I recently put a rule in my firewall that stops broadcast
> pings from my clients.  Since then, I have had some problems with
> clients not able to surf the net??  I am thinking...and I don't know
> yet...but I am thinking that the broadcast ping is needed for the
client
> to talk to the gateway???  I am always able to ping the wireless
device
> and client computer...just the client cant surf the net.  Sounds like
a
> DNS issue...but it is not.  I think it is something with the pings I
am
> blocking at the firewall (prior to the gateway).???
>
> Sully
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] We've just about had it
>
> I'm just guessing here but my "gut" (and it's getting pretty big)
tells
> me these problems may be related to proper grounding.
>
> Maybe SB could put a grounding lug on the bottom of the outdoor
units...
>
> Ray
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 5:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] We've just about had it
>
>
> > You may have something there Joe.  I don't use DHCP here either
> (static
> > private on the airBridge and static public on the client) and we
don't
> have
> > too many problems like those guys.
> >
> > I had 3 units die from the "ethernet thing", but thats about it with
> over
> 50
> > units in use. One or two customers have to do the unplug and replug
> back
> in,
> > but that's not a show stopper and the customer is willing to
continue
> > waiting for the firmware fix.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joe Laura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 2:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] We've just about had it
> >
> >
> > > Im starting to wonder why there are so many problems with S/B's. I
> bought
> > > some indoor gear day one. They had the chip problem as we all
know.
> I
> > > returned those and started using the indoor units outside in
plastic
> boxes
> > > with pigtails. I have about 10 of them like that. When the outdoor
> became
> > > available I started using those. I now have 3 pops with close to
30
> > clients.
> > > I have had 1 bad power shot, 1 dead indoor A/P from lightning and
1
> bad
> > APPO
> > > which I think my tech might have tightened the N connector to
tight.
> Other
> > > than that no problems. My clients never have to reset ever. I
check
> my
> > MRTG
> > > graphs daily and they never skip a beat. I am using 2 statics IP's
> for
> > each
> > > client. So I am not using DHCP or subnetting. Im just wondering if
> DHCP
> or
> > > subnetting is where the bugs lie??
> > > Superior Wireless
> > > New Orleans,La.
> > > www.superior1.com
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Stuart Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] We've just about had it
> > >
> > >
> > > > They do respond and not in a sales position. We have had bad
> units, we
> > > send them back. Otherwise, they are another tool in the toolbox,
and
> the
> > > seem to work well for the price. Use something else if you don't
> like
> > them,
> > > we do.
> > > >
> > > > ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> > > > From: "David Blood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Date:  Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:37:23 -0600
> > > >
> > > > >I have to agree that rereliabilty is important on the other
hand
> I
> > think
> > > > >they have earned every bit of the "manufacture of the year"  I
> don't
> > knwo
> > > of
> > > > >any other manufacture that listens and delivers as well as
> > Smartbridges.
> > > > >They have some bugs but as you can see from this list they
> dedicated
> to
> > > > >finding and quickly resolving them.
> > > > >As for phone support Smartbridges does have a hotline for
> emergencies.
> > > They
> > > > >took my call at 4:00 am their time. You can't get much better
> than
> > that.
> > > I
> > > > >know lots of companies that only have 8-5 support and no great
> forum
> > like
> > > > >this.
> > > > >
> > > > >Kind Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >David
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sam
> > > > >Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:36 PM
> > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >Subject: RE: [smartBridges] We've just about had it
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Shawn Mitchell wrote:
> > > > >> I keep saying it... STOP the new features, and START getting
us
> some
> > > > >stable
> > > > >> stuff.  I could care less if it can jump over the moon and
cook
> me
> > > > >> breakfast, lunch, and dinner... if I have to
> > > > >> reset/replace/re-config/touch/look/whatever to the unit more
> than
> > once
> > > > >every
> > > > >> few months... the TCO  AND LOSS OF CUSTOMERS get's to be too
> high...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >I have to second Shawn's comments. When I first started using
SB
> > > equipment
> > > > >I was thoroughly amazed and impressed with how well it worked.
> Since
> > that
> > > > >time (last October) I have seen the quality slowly degrade to
> where I
> > am
> > > > >afraid to deploy anything from SB. And when I do, I put it up,
> cross
> my
> > > > >fingers, knock on wood, and pray it doesn't fail.
> > > > >
> > > > >Please. Heed Shawn's request.  Get back to the basics, stop
> trying to
> > be
> > > > >all things to everyone and trying to add in each new feature
that
> is
> > > > >requested, and make your product the tremendous success that it
> was
> in
> > > the
> > > > >beginning. It's admirable that you want to do what your
customers
> want
> > > > >with regards to new features, but not at the expense of
> reliability
> and
> > > > >performance....
> > > > >
> > > > >...and our customers.
> > > > >
> > > > >Sam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
subscribe
> > > > >smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
> > > > >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> unsubscribe
> > > > >smartBridges)
> > > > >Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> unsubscribe
> > > smartBridges)
> > > > >Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > >---
> > > > >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By
Avolve.net]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]
> > > >
> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> unsubscribe
> > > smartBridges)
> > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > >
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 6/7/2003
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in
> the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in
> the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6  

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6  

Reply via email to