Yes, it's all automated.  Rodopi does everything (as would Billmax and
Platypus (sp?) and probably some others.

We have not set up debit cards, but take Amex, Discover, Visa & MasterCard.
Since most everyone with a checking account gets a debit card that is Visa
or MC, it's really not a problem.  And yes...we take cash and checks as
well.

JH
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Wirefree Network" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 9:57 PM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Could not regain association


> But is it automated??  The PayPal subscription is fully automated.  The
> client clicks on my button once, puts in their PayPal info, and
> bammo...monthly payments all automated and great records electronically
> that can be downloaded into any format including quicken.
>
> Plus the client can use ANY payment method (any credit card or debit
> card or checking account).
>
> Works well for now.
>
> Sully
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hokenson
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 9:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Could not regain association
>
> Why don't you sign up for a Costco Merchant Credit Card account?  Lot
> lower
> fees and you can bill anything to it you want.  Our billing system just
> extracts the stats from Radius and the routers and charges the bandwidth
> costs at the end of the month....
>
> JH
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "The Wirefree Network" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 8:59 PM
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Could not regain association
>
>
> > I sell my equipment to the users...this is substanitially less cost up
> front
> > for me.  Imagine how long it would take to get back my money if I had
> to
> pay
> > for 50 client units (or hopefully more soon).
> >
> > I sell the unit to them for $349 plus $150 to install it.  That is
> pretty
> > much a wash all the way around for up front costs.
> >
> > And like you said...I feel that most clients will not swap over to
> cable
> or
> > dsl being that they already paid me $500...as long as they are getting
> fast
> > and reliable service.  My rates are cheap enough.
> >
> > I use PayPal for ALLLLL money transfers including the automated
> monthly
> > subscriptions.  This does not lend itself to a "pay per bit" billing
> system.
> > The only change in billing is when a client exceeds their usage...then
> I
> > send them a PayPal bill.  Easy and painless.  NO NEED FOR A BILLING
> > DEPARTMENT!!  Sure it is 3% per transaction...but I dont care. It is
> worth
> > it.
> >
> > Will your MicroTik do autothrottling if a user hits a max cap??
> >
> > Sully
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> > Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 7:50 PM
> > To: The Wirefree Network
> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Could not regain association
> >
> >
> > All they need to do is purchase a $60 soho broadband router then their
> > 10 computers will look like one computer to you.
> >
> > There is NO way you can control how many computers they have on your
> > service. Sure you can prevent them from using more then one direct
> > connected to the net but then all they need to do is get a bb router
> > or turn on ICS and the rest of them will be able to get on..
> >
> > Don't charge more for more computers. charge for the amount of data
> > instead. Encourage them to have lots of computers. Sell them a
> > broadband router cheap. Then charge them per bit used.
> > Give them say 5gig of transfer per month and charge them $5 per gig
> > over usage.
> >
> > But back to the point no you can not prevent them from getting more
> > then one computer online more then basically hijack their computer and
> > you keep administrative control over it..  Just charge for more usage
> > instead. Also be sure to lock them in under a contract basis and keep
> > owner ship of the equipment that way if they want to move to cable
> > later on if they are still under contract with you they will have to
> > pay to get out of the contract and you get back your equipment and can
> > redeploy it.
> > But also if you sell them the equipment at cost that tend to make the
> > loyal because they don't want to "waste" that $300 investment to
> > purchase another $100 investment for a cable modem to switch service.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >  Eje Gustafsson                       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The Family Entertainment Network      http://www.fament.com
> > Phone : 620-231-7777                  Fax   : 620-231-4066
> >      - Your Full Time Professionals -
> > eBay UserID : macahan
> > ---
> > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive.
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/
> > --
> > TWN> Now have 45 customers on 1 aPPoChris...You and I are in the same
> boat.
> > I,
> > TWN> too, charge for small networks over single computers.  $39.95 for
> one
> > TWN> computer and $69.95 for 2-6 computers (residential prices) with 1
> Gig
> > and 2
> > TWN> Gig transfers per months, respectively.
> >
> > TWN> To tell you the absolute truth....I am freaking disgusted by my
> clients
> > TWN> "cheapness".  <-- its a word.  Our homes range from $400k to
> $550k...so
> > TWN> these people have money.
> >
> > TWN> When I put an add on their doorstep, they call me up in almost
> tears
> > (of
> > TWN> joy)....saying..."FINALLY...FINALLY....HIGH-SPEED INTERNET WHERE
> WE
> > LIVE...I
> > TWN> WILL PAY ANYTHING."  My service is unthrottled 1.5 Meg up and
> down.
> > So...my
> > TWN> prices are WAY lower than what I could be charging.  But...it is
> all
> > part of
> > TWN> my business plan.  I want to be around for the long haul.  Not
> just
> > rape
> > TWN> them for a few months...then DSL or cable modem access moves in
> and
> > they all
> > TWN> switch over.
> >
> > TWN> So...back to my "cheap customers"...anyway....once it comes down
> to
> the
> > TWN> actual selection of the service plan (39.95 or 69.95), they all
> turn
> > into
> > TWN> freaking cheapos.  URGGGHHHH...I hate it.  They will say stuff
> like,
> > "Well,
> > TWN> Yes... I have 5 computers in my home...but can I just pay $39.95
> if I
> > just
> > TWN> use one at a time?"  Or...my favorite straight up lie, "I only
> need
> the
> > TWN> $39.95 account because we will only use this one computer for
> > Internet."
> > TWN> You know DAMN WELL that they are going to spoof that MAC into
> their
> > router
> > TWN> and be smiling like they made one over on me.
> >
> > TWN> I am seriously thinking of installing VPN clients on each "PAID"
> > computer
> > TWN> that will only allow THAT computer Internet access.  But even
> then...I
> > bet
> > TWN> there is some easy way around it.  For example, using Windows XP
> "Share
> > TWN> Internet Connection" option.
> >
> > TWN> Anyone have a way to stop this?!??!?!
> >
> > TWN> Sully
> > TWN>   -----Original Message-----
> > TWN>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of phantam
> > TWN>   Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 10:31 PM
> > TWN>   To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > TWN>   Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Could not regain association
> >
> >
> > TWN>   As far as I can tell I have yet to see a SB slip a MAC of a
> client
> > behind
> > TWN> it through, im glad for this mac nat or whatever u'd like to call
> it,
> > TWN> because its easy to do management on it, and I don't have to
> worry
> > about the
> > TWN> clients changing there dumb network cards. HOWEVER it kinda sucks
> when
> > I
> > TWN> normally charge more for multiple computer networks and I can't
> tell
> if
> > TWN> someones scamming me with a router or a switch L but oh well its
> kewl
> > its
> > TWN> still limited at the sb mac
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> TWN>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----
> > TWN> --
> >
> > TWN>   From: The Wirefree Network [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN>   Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 3:42 PM
> > TWN>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   Just finished replacing one of the 3 bad units.  This is what I
> found
> > TWN> out...and probably how I will test my units prior to deployment
> from
> > now on.
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   I logged into the unit with my laptop.  I then noticed that I
> was
> > TWN> associated.  So...I did a "reset" with simpleMonitor.  It lost
> > association
> > TWN> and did not regain it.  So, I hit "reset" again and it
> associated.  I
> > then
> > TWN> tried this several times.  2 out of 3 times it WOULD reassociate,
> but
> > that
> > TWN> 3rd time it would never regain assocation.  I tried continuous
> pings
> to
> > the
> > TWN> AP and to the GATEWAY with no help.  It would not regain
> association
> > unless
> > TWN> I hit "RESET" a couple times.
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   I just wanted to provide this info to everyone as a way to
> check
> your
> > TWN> units prior to deployment.  Could save a few bucks with
> replacement
> > labor.
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   Here's a question:
> >
> > TWN>   1. Way back when, the airBridge units used to pass the MAC
> address
> of
> > the
> > TWN> internal NIC.  Therefore, you had to have the internal MAC in
> your
> > TWN> authorization table (not the sB unit).  So...here's my
> question...Now,
> > with
> > TWN> the new firmware, is it possible that the internal MAC is showing
> up
> at
> > the
> > TWN> AP (sometimes) and being rejected?  I only put the sB unit MAC in
> my
> > TWN> authorization table.
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   Just an idea....
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>   Sully
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>     -----Original Message-----
> > TWN>     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark P.
> Sullivan
> > TWN>     Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 8:14 AM
> > TWN>     To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN>     Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Now have 45 customers on 1 aPPo
> >
> > TWN>     Thanks for the info.  But, you have to agree that this is NOT
> > TWN> acceptable.  You cant possibly ask the customer to do this
> everytime??
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>     Sully
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>     -----Original Message-----
> > TWN>     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Blood
> > TWN>     Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 8:07 AM
> > TWN>     To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN>     Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Now have 45 customers on 1 aPPo
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>     I have recently found that with some of the units the don't
> want
> to
> > TWN> reassociate I can turn them off for five to ten minutes then turn
> them
> > back
> > TWN> on and they then work great. Not sure why this works but it did
> for 3
> > of my
> > TWN> customers this last week. The tuff part of this trick is just
> sitting
> > there
> > TWN> doing nothing for 10 minutes to see if it will work.
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>     Kind Regards,
> >
> > TWN>     David
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>       -----Original Message-----
> > TWN>       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark P.
> Sullivan
> > TWN>       Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 8:49 AM
> > TWN>       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > TWN>       Subject: [smartBridges] Now have 45 customers on 1 aPPo
> >
> > TWN>       Well...thought I would keep everyone posted on my numbers.
> >
> > TWN>       As of last weekend, we went from 30 to 45 units off a
> single
> > aPPo.  I
> > TWN> actually have 30 units directly off my head-end aPPo (one of
> which is
> > the
> > TWN> repeater) and 15 more off the repeater.  The latest 15 are all
> > airBridges.
> > TWN> We are pulling about 1.2 Gig per day through the head-end (500
> meg of
> > which
> > TWN> is from the repeater clients).
> >
> > TWN>       1.      I did the bulk update with the latest simpleNMS and
> > changed
> > TWN> RTS/CTS and FRAG to 1496 and 100 on all client units (not
> head-end).
> > This
> > TWN> was a pretty cool feature.  However, twice within 1 day ALLLL my
> units
> > lost
> > TWN> association and I had to reboot my head-end aPPo to get them
> back.
> > TWN> So...needless to say, I changed the RTS/FRAG settings back to
> default.
> > No
> > TWN> problems since.
> >
> > TWN>       2.      I used simpleDeploy to burn ALL new customers.  I
> then
> > hot
> > TWN> tested them for a minimum of 24 hours prior to deployment with
> none
> of
> > them
> > TWN> blinking an eye.  Out of the 15 deployed, I have 3 units that are
> > losing
> > TWN> association and not getting it back.  I have had the customer do
> a
> > power
> > TWN> reset by pulling the plug, factory default reset, etc, etc....but
> no
> > luck.
> > TWN> Oddly enough, one of the 3 units just came back online this
> morning
> > with no
> > TWN> assistance.   Pretty darn flakey!  Note: all the units could be
> pinged
> > from
> > TWN> the wired side and logged into (but DEAD on the wireless side).
> Now
> I
> > am
> > TWN> going to go do some climbing and replacing.
> >
> > TWN>       Side Note: My head-end aPPo which has been online since Dec
> 25th
> > 2003
> > TWN> is going down hill quick.  The symptoms are this:
> >
> > TWN>       1.      About 3-4 times a week, the unit becomes
> unresponsive
> on
> > the
> > TWN> Ethernet side while still passing traffic (hard reboot).
> >
> > TWN>       2.      The RTS/FRAG thing mentioned above really had me
> shaking
> > in my
> > TWN> boots (reset to default).
> > TWN>       3.      I have been working with sB for a while on this
> flakey
> > aPPo,
> > TWN> and I am now struggling with EC to get a replacement unit before
> this
> > one
> > TWN> dies.
> >
> > TWN>       I think that sB is awesome.  They are VERY responsive and
> have
> > even
> > TWN> phoned me personally to resolve issues.  All my units previously
> > deployed
> > TWN> are working wonderfully.  3 out of the latest 15 have not.  That
> > doesn't
> > TWN> look good, but I am sure they are getting to the bottom of it.
> Maybe
> > it is
> > TWN> a bad simpleDeploy release??
> >
> >
> >
> > TWN>       Sully
> >
> > --
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to