Maybe there was a barrel of chips that all got mixed together. :-) Just having some fun at SB's expense.
--Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Email Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [smartBridges] How to identify the suspect devices Duh!!!!!!!!!!! Alex this doesn't make sense This raido gets a bad part, the next radio on the line gets a good part I certainly do not understand this? If the MAC addresses are in a line why wouldn't the bad or good parts be in line Again A list would be helpful Thanks Joe K -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sB Tech Support Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [smartBridges] How to identify the suspect devices The list won't be accurate as not all units are affected. If the product is purchased during May or June and has the same symptom as per Customer Advisory http://www.smartbridges.com/pdf/Customer%20Advisory.pdf , then you need to apply the firmware fix. Thanks. Alex sB Tech Support -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Pierce Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:00 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [smartBridges] How to identify the suspect devices if you have them in a text file format, I can use notepad to search for certain mac numbers. We have recv'd some during that time that work and some that are suspect, but one that we did the upgrade to, wouldn't assoicate at all, going back on rev, it would associate. ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:57:29 +0800 >We can provide the MAC#s. But the list would be quite unreadable because >the models do not run in consecutive #s. But if you suspect a MAC#, >please feel free to ask us. We can quickly look up in the database and >confirm to you. > >On the other hand we are quite certain that bulk of this problem exist >only in the factory shipments made during second half of June. By end >June we put shipment hold from the factory and at the distributors. >Factory resumed shipments on July 9 and the distributors are going to >start shipping the new products. > >So the simple guideline we are suggesting is that if you bought the >products in June and July and they are exhibiting the symptoms, don't >fight it. Try the F/W upgrade. This is not a destructive upgrade. > >The test is simple. Power on the device for a few hours. Associate to an >AP. Power cycle. The unit has problem if it can not associate back to >the AP and the blue LED keeps flashing. This test can be accelerated by >blowing warm air on the unit from a hair dryer. > >Nish > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Pierce >Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:36 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > >Well then give us a broad range of mac addresses so we can see if we may >have one of the affected units. Is there a way to interrogate the >hardware with a simple program to see if it contains a chip version that >points to a possible problem ? > >---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:44:02 +0800 > >>That is because aP-Indoor were not manufactured during this time. >> >>This is a limited batch issue - only some quantities of the products >>manufactured during a couple of weeks time frame were affected. These >>couple of weeks get expanded out into a couple of months due to how the >>products move through the distribution channel and warehousing. >> >>We track manufacturing by MAC #s. But a whole bunch of products flow >>through the production line at the same time so it is not possible for >>us to know the details of which component was used on which MAC #. >> >>Nish >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Saathoff >>Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:52 PM >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? >> >>John, >> >>Unfortunately, that's not true. I have about 20 bad indoor units and a >>friend of my also has RMA'd about the same. The indoor AB uses the >same >>board as the outdoor and many of the units will fail under heat the >same >>as >>the outdoor one's. Some don't need to be all that hot just sitting in >a >>window were they get warm. >> >>I'm assuming you just haven't received any of the bad AirBridge >indoors. >>Wish I could say the same. :-) >> >>--Mike >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Hokenson >>Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:42 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? >> >> >>What we've done is just switch to the Indoor AP in bridge mode until >>this >>issue has been dealt with. They are not suffering from any of the >known >>issues. >> >>JH >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:37 PM >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? >> >> >>> Look into reliawave, proxim, or one of the other certified solutions >>as a >>> temporary measure. That's what we're doing. It's going to cost us >>more >>up >>> front (trust me, it's more money that we don't really have) but it's >>worth >>> it to keep clients happy and to keep our installs flowing. We have >>the >>> attitude that for now we are focusing on revenue. We need to get our >>client >>> base up and keep them on so we (all WISPs) don't get known as >>unreliable. >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:20 PM >>> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >>firmware? >>> >>> >>> > Ray, >>> > >>> > You do have a point but I really dont have any other option >>financially >>to >>> > choose from this was it I could start using some Linksys wet 11's >>but in >>> other >>> > forums when I was doing research these seemed to work but also had >a >>> lockup >>> > problem a while back so I decided to go with a known vendor (Smart >>> bridges) and >>> > I was happy until now. >>> > That's part of my sales pitch I use fully qualified outdoor rated >>radios >>> not >>> > cheap store bought stuff and people like the concept I cant go back >>on >>my >>> word >>> > now hehehe I think if SB had a good R & D process we would not see >>as >>many >>> > problems as we do. I think that going forward they or we need to >>press >>> this >>> > issue so we don't keep getting caught with our pants down. I >offered >>to >>> even >>> > devote many hours of my not so free time to help develop this >>process >>and >>> even >>> > field any tech calls for them once I get more established and not >>having >>> to do >>> > all the work for my WISP with just my partner and I. I think we can >>make >>> this >>> > product really kick some butt, but we have to have the buy in of >>smart >>> bridges >>> > and a few key individuals that will be diligent in testing new >>product >>> (BETA) >>> > and smart bridges will then use this as valuable input before >>implementing >>> any >>> > final changes and we will help with the approval process. I am sure >>there >>> are >>> > many people that are willing to help with this process such as me >>and >>> those >>> > that have some kind of background with working with engineers and >>> development >>> > people. >>> > >>> > What are your thoughts?? >>> > >>> > Martin >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Quoting Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > >>> > > My concern is that with all we've invested in these products (and >>I >>> really >>> > > like them) distributors might start to drop them. Think about >it, >>if >>> you >>> > > were Ecomm would you want all this hassle? >>> > > >>> > > I would rather SB recall or at least put a hold on all shipments >>until >>> they >>> > > get this issue fixed. I would rather use another CPE product >that >>works >>> so >>> > > I don't look like a dumb a** to my clients by using beta products >>that >>> > > simply aren't yet ready. >>> > > >>> > > I would switch back to SB as soon as the units are again working. >>> > > >>> > > Ray >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > > From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:20 PM >>> > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >>firmware? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > I would agree with that! >>> > > > I did not catch what Dist they were getting them from? I get >>mine >>from >>> > > ECOMM >>> > > > and they have been pretty good for the most part. I dont like >>the >>idea >>> of >>> > > > having a bad unit and they charge your card for the repalcement >>ahead >>> of >>> > > time >>> > > > then refund you when they get the non working one back??? Seems >>> backwards >>> > > to me >>> > > > I pitched a fit and got them to send me an APPO in advance >>exchange >>> liek >>> > > their >>> > > > warranty clearly states without being charged 1st then charge >me >>if >>I >>> > > dont >>> > > send >>> > > > it back within 10 days. This was after I ordered two new APPO's >>and >>> one I >>> > > > recieved was a used unit sent back for repair! >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Quoting Eje Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > > > >>> > > > > shrug.. Now I am going to shock this entirely list by finally >>> agreeing >>> > > > > with Chris.. Can't agree more with what you just said. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > If they all where bad out of the box or a lot of them where >>bad >>out >>> of >>> > > > > the box it's the distributor/resellers problem not the >>manufacturers >>> > > > > if teh distributor or reseller don't want to work with you >you >>might >>> > > > > try to resolve it with the manufacturer if someone gets sued >>it >>> should >>> > > > > be the dist not the manufacturer. The manufacturer will not >>give >>you >>> a >>> > > > > refund. They sold the unit for say $10 and you purchased it >>for >>$20 >>> > > > > from the dist so should the manufacturer give you a refund >for >>$20 >>> and >>> > > > > lose $10 ??? Come on I think not. If someone should give you >a >>> refund >>> > > > > it's the dist. However if the dist will not work it out then >>the >>> > > > > manufacturer can give you a working replacement. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Best regards, >>> > > > > Eje Gustafsson >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com >>> > > > > Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 >>> > > > > - Your Full Time Professionals - >>> > > > > eBay UserID : macahan >>> > > > > --- >>> > > > > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. >>> > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > p> Ok T n T >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> WOW Talk about a drastic calling for attention in my view, >>most >>> of >>> > > the >>> > > > > p> people on the board are working on resolving problems and >>your >>> > > response >>> > > > > toa >>> > > > > p> firmware issue is that they are advertised as carrier >class >>and >>> that >>> > > > > they >>> > > > > p> don't offer cash refunds? Umm does cisco or lucent? If so >>I'd >>> gladly >>> > > like >>> > > > > to >>> > > > > p> get my money back on some AP1000's or CPE Ethernet >>Converters >>and >>> a >>> > > few >>> > > > > p> cisco 350's. A class action suit? Really I have yet to >hear >>> anyone >>> > > that >>> > > > > is >>> > > > > p> pissed at the fact that they only exchange units in a >>timely >>> manner >>> > > and >>> > > > > wont >>> > > > > p> give them there cash back? Personally I don't recall many >>groups >>> > > that >>> > > > > will >>> > > > > p> do cash refunds from the primary company isn't this a >point >>to >>> deal >>> > > with >>> > > > > p> your SUPPLIER if you feel you need to return goods cause >>you >>> don't >>> > > want >>> > > > > p> them. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> As far as I can tell in the past SB has stood behind there >>> problems >>> > > > > p> including phone calls from half way across the world at >>10am to >>> help >>> > > > > solve >>> > > > > p> MANY users problems in a one on one basis, they take >>suggestions >>> and >>> > > work >>> > > > > to >>> > > > > p> help mold there product. Really you have invested 6,000$ >>wow I >>> have >>> > > > > spent >>> > > > > p> over 25,000 upgrading my network with SB's powering it and >>i >>have >>> > > yet >>> > > to >>> > > > > p> find a reason to neglect the funds spent. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> AS A NOTE IT SAYS >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> DOA Products must be returned in original condition, and >>the >>> return >>> > > box >>> > > > > must >>> > > > > p> include all components and originally packaged with the >>product, >>> > > > > including >>> > > > > p> cable, software, manual, etc. You must obtain an RMA >number >>> before >>> > > you >>> > > > > p> return any defective or DOA products. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> REQUIRES ORIGINAL BOX ON DOA UNITS... DOA MEANS DEAD ON >>ARRIVAL >>> > > HENCE >>> > > > > YOU >>> > > > > p> JUST GOT IT SO THEY WANT IT BACK HOW THEY SENT IT SINCE IT >>WAS >>> DEAD >>> > > AS >>> > > > > SOON >>> > > > > p> AS YOU GOT IT. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> As for the returning on a one to one basis it is not FINE >>PRINT >>> it >>> > > is >>> > > > > p> blatantly shown in Standard Sized text under the warranty >>> > > conditions. >>> > > > > Not >>> > > > > p> like they used size 1 font to try to hide it from you. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> Sorry if I'm being a di*k but this is just my take on your >>> comment. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> Chris >>> > > > > p> -----Original Message----- >>> > > > > p> From: Tom & Toni Maris >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > p> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:44 PM >>> > > > > p> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than >>> $6,000.00 >>> > > in >>> > > > > this >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. >>> > > > > p> On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we >>read >>the >>> > > fine >>> > > > > print >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just >>> > > replacement >>> > > > > units >>> > > > > p> and that you have to have the original box! >>> > > > > p> Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier >>class. >>> > > > > p> This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like an >>honest >>> > > > > company. >>> > > > > p> First I would like to know where they get off saying >>anything >>> about >>> > > > > Carrier >>> > > > > p> class. >>> > > > > p> Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, >>why do >>> you >>> > > need >>> > > > > an >>> > > > > p> original box to sned them back, and why don't they do >>refunds? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this >>Smartbridge >>> > > company >>> > > > > p> stand behind their products or give everyone their money >>back. >>He >>> > > thinks >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> that their is probably enough people like us who got >ripped >>off >>> to >>> > > get a >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this >>pile >>> of >>> > > junk >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> Very very disapointed >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> T n T >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > > > >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>new >>> > > firmware? >>> > > > > >>Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700 >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Okay so it appears I am not the only one having the problem >>here >>> We >>> > > hav >>> > > > > >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some as far as 7.2 miles >>the >>> last >>> > > > > >>revision 0.01.06 just will not associate to any of my APS I >>had >>> > > sugested >>> > > > > >>there is something going on here and I am finally able to >>get on >>> this >>> > > > > list >>> > > > > >>and post only to see what I have been telling support since >>last >>> week >>> > > > > >>before >>> > > > > >>the release only to be told its been working well in the >>"LAB" >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be >>tested >>> in >>> > > a >>> > > > > >>consistant manor not just really close up. >>> > > > > >>1. Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if >possible >>> > > > > >>2. At each point do some speed tests to confirm it is >>working >>and >>> how >>> > > > > well >>> > > > > >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get >>association >>but >>> > > speeds >>> > > > > >>are >>> > > > > >>WAY down. >>> > > > > >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of >>testing >>> before >>> > > ANY >>> > > > > >>final revision is released to save time and nerves of those >>of >>us >>> in >>> > > the >>> > > > > >>field! >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have >>been >>> tested >>> > > in >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this something >>that is >>a >>> > > > > secret?? >>> > > > > >>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that are >>> working >>> > > rock >>> > > > > >>solid and have ALL my customers down. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> We have tried it (ver 0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I >>have >>> seen >>> > > > > >>problems >>> > > > > >>but to be fair we still need to identify if this firmware >is >>> > > compatible >>> > > > > >>with >>> > > > > >>the OLD atmel chip they had. We tried this new firmware on >>the >>> only >>> > > radio >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>we >>> > > > > >>have left since the other 2 locked up hardcore and are now >>> doorstops >>> > > > > after >>> > > > > >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just before the >>final >>> > > release. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and we found >>the >>> same >>> > > > > thing >>> > > > > >>on rev 2 >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>I don't how you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware >>is >>not >>> > > > > >>compatible >>> > > > > >>with the old good atmel chip per say. >>> > > > > >>The two test radios that locked up we just bought less then >>a >>> month >>> > > ago so >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>I >>> > > > > >>can only assume they had the problem. Unless they can come >>up >>with >>> a >>> > > way >>> > > > > to >>> > > > > >>positively identify which units are suspect with the >suspect >>chip. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>I suggest you do the same tests with a spare radio that you >>can >>> > > afford >>> > > to >>> > > > > >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically what >>happens is >>> the >>> > > > > radio >>> > > > > >>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to >>log >>into >>> > > the >>> > > > > >>radio, the power and wireless light stay on solid and you >no >>> longer >>> > > get a >>> > > > > >>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and >>don't >>> see >>> > > how >>> > > > > >>that would work since that just resets passwords and the IP >>> address >>> > > etc >>> > > > > but >>> > > > > >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to >>unlock >>it >>> but >>> > > > > that >>> > > > > >>was useless because you need a network connection to the >>radio >>> > > hahaha. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you >can >>see >>> in >>> > > our >>> > > > > >>notes does not work for us yet Smart bridges claims it >works >>well >>> in >>> > > the >>> > > > > >>lab >>> > > > > >>and others have tested as well which I would like to know >>how >>far >>> > > away >>> > > > > they >>> > > > > >>tested the radio. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>1. ver 0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 >>miles >>we >>> > > > > associate >>> > > > > >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads fine >and >>at >>> same >>> > > 3.5 >>> > > > > >>mile location we get not even half the speeds we did with >>rev >>> 0.01.04 >>> > > we >>> > > > > >>get >>> > > > > >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet loss. >>> > > > > >>RSSI 85% and signal quality 90-95% with both firmware. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with >>firmware >>> > > 0.01.04 >>> > > > > get >>> > > > > >>speeds of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final >>revision >>> and >>> > > we >>> > > > > >>associate but thats it radio will not ping APPO on tower >but >>we >>> can >>> > > ping >>> > > > > >>ABO >>> > > > > >>radio with new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with >>both >>> > > firmware. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>So as you can see this firmware will not work for us. I >>don't >>> > > understand >>> > > > > >>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing >>issue? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>The only question I have is will version 0.01.06 work on >old >>> radios >>> > > with >>> > > > > >>old >>> > > > > >>atmel chip? and if not then we will proceed further to load >>the >>> > > 0.01.06 >>> > > > > on >>> > > > > >>clients radios but once again we have no way of telling >>which >>> radios >>> > > have >>> > > > > >>new or old atmel chip? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs >>> > > > > >>out to 7.2 miles. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>> > > > > >>From: "Colorado Wisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM >>> > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>new >>> > > firmware? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Nish, >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>We updated several of one of our "overheating" units this >>morning >>> and >>> > > it >>> > > > > >>will not associate with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have no >>plans >>> to >>> > > > > update >>> > > > > >>the firmware on the APs, they have been rock solid. Is >>there >>> going >>> > > to >>> > > be >>> > > > > >>firmware that will interact this firmware version? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Chris >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>--- >>> > > > > >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net >>> > > > > >>Bringing high speed internet to rural communities. >>> > > > > >>P.O. Box 55 >>> > > > > >>Wellington, Colorado 80549 >>> > > > > >>970-218-5295 >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>> > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>On Behalf Of Nish Park >>> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 2:49 AM >>> > > > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>new >>> > > firmware? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Tim, >>> > > > > >>Can you please elaborate a little more on this "still doing >>the >>> same >>> > > > > >>thing!". What was the problem, new unit (June or July >>purchase?), >>> > > RSSI >>> > > > > and >>> > > > > >>LQ values, Brand of AP? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>We have confirmed that the problem of loosing association >at >>> elevated >>> > > > > >>temperature has been solved. This has been the focus of all >>our >>> > > efforts >>> > > > > and >>> > > > > >>we are quire confident that issue no longer exist. Now we >>will >>be >>> > > > > focusing >>> > > > > >>on testing if there has been any other side effects. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >From some of the emails it appears that some of you are >>trying >>> to >>> > > see >>> > > > > >> >if >>> > > > > >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of >>"periodic >>> > > lockup". >>> > > I >>> > > > > >>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but that >>has >>> not >>> > > been >>> > > > > >>the >>> > > > > >>focus of the current activity on hand. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Thanks for your support. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Nish >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>> > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >>On Behalf Of Tim Harris >>> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:32 PM >>> > > > > >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>> > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>new >>> > > firmware? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit. Had >>to >>> unplug >>> > > it >>> > > > > to >>> > > > > >>get it to start working after uploading the new firmware. >>Started >>> > > > > working >>> > > > > >>fine. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Customer called back an hour later and left two messages, >>still >>> doing >>> > > the >>> > > > > >>same thing! >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........ >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might have a >>point. >>> This >>> > > > > seems >>> > > > > >>to be getting ridiculous. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response >>then.. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>Tim Harris, Operations >>> > > > > >>www.dwisp.net >>> > > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>> > > > > >>From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > > > >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM >>> > > > > >>Subject: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >>> firmware? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting ready >>to >>> try, >>> > > but >>> > > > > >> > wanted to check first to see what sort of luck others >>have >>had. >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > Thanks >>> > > > > >> > Sam >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>> subscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>> > > > > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>> > > unsubscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>> > > > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > (in >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > >>body type unsubscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > (in >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > >>body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>> > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>> unsubscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>> > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>> unsubscribe >>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>> > > > > p> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* >>> > > > > p> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail >>> > > > > >>> > > > > p> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > p> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>> > > > > p> smartBridges <yournickname> >>> > > > > p> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>> unsubscribe >>> > > > > p> smartBridges) >>> > > > > p> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>> > > smartBridges >>> > > > > <yournickname> >>> > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>unsubscribe >>> > > > > smartBridges) >>> > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Martin Moreno >>> > > > Blazen Wireless >>> > > > 909-907-4106 >>> > > > www.blazenwireless.com >>> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >>> > > smartBridges <yournickname> >>> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>unsubscribe >>> > > smartBridges) >>> > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > --- >>> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >>> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>> > > Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 >>> > > >>> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>> smartBridges >>> > > <yournickname> >>> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>unsubscribe >>> > > smartBridges) >>> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > Martin Moreno >>> > Blazen Wireless >>> > 909-907-4106 >>> > www.blazenwireless.com >>> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>> smartBridges <yournickname> >>> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >unsubscribe >>> smartBridges) >>> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> > >>> >>> >>> --- >>> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >>> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>> Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 >>> >>> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>smartBridges) >>> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>--- >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] >> >> >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
