Guess I'm not clear as to how mac addresses are assigned in a assembly line production environment.
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Joe Email" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:55:30 -0500 >Duh!!!!!!!!!!! >Alex this doesn't make sense > >This raido gets a bad part, the next radio on the line gets a good part > >I certainly do not understand this? >If the MAC addresses are in a line why wouldn't the bad or good parts be in >line > >Again >A list would be helpful > > >Thanks > >Joe K > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sB Tech Support >Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:26 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [smartBridges] How to identify the suspect devices > > >The list won't be accurate as not all units are affected. If the product >is purchased during May or June and has the same symptom as per Customer >Advisory http://www.smartbridges.com/pdf/Customer%20Advisory.pdf , then >you need to apply the firmware fix. Thanks. > >Alex >sB Tech Support > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Pierce >Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:00 PM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: Re: [smartBridges] How to identify the suspect devices > >if you have them in a text file format, I can use notepad to search for >certain mac numbers. We have recv'd some during that time that work and >some that are suspect, but one that we did the upgrade to, wouldn't >assoicate at all, going back on rev, it would associate. > >---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:57:29 +0800 > >>We can provide the MAC#s. But the list would be quite unreadable >because >>the models do not run in consecutive #s. But if you suspect a MAC#, >>please feel free to ask us. We can quickly look up in the database and >>confirm to you. >> >>On the other hand we are quite certain that bulk of this problem exist >>only in the factory shipments made during second half of June. By end >>June we put shipment hold from the factory and at the distributors. >>Factory resumed shipments on July 9 and the distributors are going to >>start shipping the new products. >> >>So the simple guideline we are suggesting is that if you bought the >>products in June and July and they are exhibiting the symptoms, don't >>fight it. Try the F/W upgrade. This is not a destructive upgrade. >> >>The test is simple. Power on the device for a few hours. Associate to >an >>AP. Power cycle. The unit has problem if it can not associate back to >>the AP and the blue LED keeps flashing. This test can be accelerated by >>blowing warm air on the unit from a hair dryer. >> >>Nish >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Pierce >>Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:36 AM >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? >> >>Well then give us a broad range of mac addresses so we can see if we >may >>have one of the affected units. Is there a way to interrogate the >>hardware with a simple program to see if it contains a chip version >that >>points to a possible problem ? >> >>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:44:02 +0800 >> >>>That is because aP-Indoor were not manufactured during this time. >>> >>>This is a limited batch issue - only some quantities of the products >>>manufactured during a couple of weeks time frame were affected. These >>>couple of weeks get expanded out into a couple of months due to how >the >>>products move through the distribution channel and warehousing. >>> >>>We track manufacturing by MAC #s. But a whole bunch of products flow >>>through the production line at the same time so it is not possible for >>>us to know the details of which component was used on which MAC #. >>> >>>Nish >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Saathoff >>>Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:52 PM >>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >firmware? >>> >>>John, >>> >>>Unfortunately, that's not true. I have about 20 bad indoor units and >a >>>friend of my also has RMA'd about the same. The indoor AB uses the >>same >>>board as the outdoor and many of the units will fail under heat the >>same >>>as >>>the outdoor one's. Some don't need to be all that hot just sitting in >>a >>>window were they get warm. >>> >>>I'm assuming you just haven't received any of the bad AirBridge >>indoors. >>>Wish I could say the same. :-) >>> >>>--Mike >>> >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Hokenson >>>Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:42 AM >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >firmware? >>> >>> >>>What we've done is just switch to the Indoor AP in bridge mode until >>>this >>>issue has been dealt with. They are not suffering from any of the >>known >>>issues. >>> >>>JH >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:37 PM >>>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >firmware? >>> >>> >>>> Look into reliawave, proxim, or one of the other certified solutions >>>as a >>>> temporary measure. That's what we're doing. It's going to cost us >>>more >>>up >>>> front (trust me, it's more money that we don't really have) but it's >>>worth >>>> it to keep clients happy and to keep our installs flowing. We have >>>the >>>> attitude that for now we are focusing on revenue. We need to get >our >>>client >>>> base up and keep them on so we (all WISPs) don't get known as >>>unreliable. >>>> >>>> Ray >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:20 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >>>firmware? >>>> >>>> >>>> > Ray, >>>> > >>>> > You do have a point but I really dont have any other option >>>financially >>>to >>>> > choose from this was it I could start using some Linksys wet 11's >>>but in >>>> other >>>> > forums when I was doing research these seemed to work but also had >>a >>>> lockup >>>> > problem a while back so I decided to go with a known vendor (Smart >>>> bridges) and >>>> > I was happy until now. >>>> > That's part of my sales pitch I use fully qualified outdoor rated >>>radios >>>> not >>>> > cheap store bought stuff and people like the concept I cant go >back >>>on >>>my >>>> word >>>> > now hehehe I think if SB had a good R & D process we would not see >>>as >>>many >>>> > problems as we do. I think that going forward they or we need to >>>press >>>> this >>>> > issue so we don't keep getting caught with our pants down. I >>offered >>>to >>>> even >>>> > devote many hours of my not so free time to help develop this >>>process >>>and >>>> even >>>> > field any tech calls for them once I get more established and not >>>having >>>> to do >>>> > all the work for my WISP with just my partner and I. I think we >can >>>make >>>> this >>>> > product really kick some butt, but we have to have the buy in of >>>smart >>>> bridges >>>> > and a few key individuals that will be diligent in testing new >>>product >>>> (BETA) >>>> > and smart bridges will then use this as valuable input before >>>implementing >>>> any >>>> > final changes and we will help with the approval process. I am >sure >>>there >>>> are >>>> > many people that are willing to help with this process such as me >>>and >>>> those >>>> > that have some kind of background with working with engineers and >>>> development >>>> > people. >>>> > >>>> > What are your thoughts?? >>>> > >>>> > Martin >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Quoting Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> > >>>> > > My concern is that with all we've invested in these products >(and >>>I >>>> really >>>> > > like them) distributors might start to drop them. Think about >>it, >>>if >>>> you >>>> > > were Ecomm would you want all this hassle? >>>> > > >>>> > > I would rather SB recall or at least put a hold on all shipments >>>until >>>> they >>>> > > get this issue fixed. I would rather use another CPE product >>that >>>works >>>> so >>>> > > I don't look like a dumb a** to my clients by using beta >products >>>that >>>> > > simply aren't yet ready. >>>> > > >>>> > > I would switch back to SB as soon as the units are again >working. >>>> > > >>>> > > Ray >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>>> > > From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:20 PM >>>> > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >>>firmware? >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > I would agree with that! >>>> > > > I did not catch what Dist they were getting them from? I get >>>mine >>>from >>>> > > ECOMM >>>> > > > and they have been pretty good for the most part. I dont like >>>the >>>idea >>>> of >>>> > > > having a bad unit and they charge your card for the >repalcement >>>ahead >>>> of >>>> > > time >>>> > > > then refund you when they get the non working one back??? >Seems >>>> backwards >>>> > > to me >>>> > > > I pitched a fit and got them to send me an APPO in advance >>>exchange >>>> liek >>>> > > their >>>> > > > warranty clearly states without being charged 1st then charge >>me >>>if >>>I >>>> > > dont >>>> > > send >>>> > > > it back within 10 days. This was after I ordered two new >APPO's >>>and >>>> one I >>>> > > > recieved was a used unit sent back for repair! >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Quoting Eje Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > shrug.. Now I am going to shock this entirely list by >finally >>>> agreeing >>>> > > > > with Chris.. Can't agree more with what you just said. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > If they all where bad out of the box or a lot of them where >>>bad >>>out >>>> of >>>> > > > > the box it's the distributor/resellers problem not the >>>manufacturers >>>> > > > > if teh distributor or reseller don't want to work with you >>you >>>might >>>> > > > > try to resolve it with the manufacturer if someone gets sued >>>it >>>> should >>>> > > > > be the dist not the manufacturer. The manufacturer will not >>>give >>>you >>>> a >>>> > > > > refund. They sold the unit for say $10 and you purchased it >>>for >>>$20 >>>> > > > > from the dist so should the manufacturer give you a refund >>for >>>$20 >>>> and >>>> > > > > lose $10 ??? Come on I think not. If someone should give you >>a >>>> refund >>>> > > > > it's the dist. However if the dist will not work it out then >>>the >>>> > > > > manufacturer can give you a working replacement. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Best regards, >>>> > > > > Eje Gustafsson >>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com >>>> > > > > Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 >>>> > > > > - Your Full Time Professionals - >>>> > > > > eBay UserID : macahan >>>> > > > > --- >>>> > > > > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. >>>> > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ >>>> > > > > -- >>>> > > > > p> Ok T n T >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> WOW Talk about a drastic calling for attention in my >view, >>>most >>>> of >>>> > > the >>>> > > > > p> people on the board are working on resolving problems and >>>your >>>> > > response >>>> > > > > toa >>>> > > > > p> firmware issue is that they are advertised as carrier >>class >>>and >>>> that >>>> > > > > they >>>> > > > > p> don't offer cash refunds? Umm does cisco or lucent? If so >>>I'd >>>> gladly >>>> > > like >>>> > > > > to >>>> > > > > p> get my money back on some AP1000's or CPE Ethernet >>>Converters >>>and >>>> a >>>> > > few >>>> > > > > p> cisco 350's. A class action suit? Really I have yet to >>hear >>>> anyone >>>> > > that >>>> > > > > is >>>> > > > > p> pissed at the fact that they only exchange units in a >>>timely >>>> manner >>>> > > and >>>> > > > > wont >>>> > > > > p> give them there cash back? Personally I don't recall many >>>groups >>>> > > that >>>> > > > > will >>>> > > > > p> do cash refunds from the primary company isn't this a >>point >>>to >>>> deal >>>> > > with >>>> > > > > p> your SUPPLIER if you feel you need to return goods cause >>>you >>>> don't >>>> > > want >>>> > > > > p> them. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> As far as I can tell in the past SB has stood behind >there >>>> problems >>>> > > > > p> including phone calls from half way across the world at >>>10am to >>>> help >>>> > > > > solve >>>> > > > > p> MANY users problems in a one on one basis, they take >>>suggestions >>>> and >>>> > > work >>>> > > > > to >>>> > > > > p> help mold there product. Really you have invested 6,000$ >>>wow I >>>> have >>>> > > > > spent >>>> > > > > p> over 25,000 upgrading my network with SB's powering it >and >>>i >>>have >>>> > > yet >>>> > > to >>>> > > > > p> find a reason to neglect the funds spent. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> AS A NOTE IT SAYS >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> DOA Products must be returned in original condition, and >>>the >>>> return >>>> > > box >>>> > > > > must >>>> > > > > p> include all components and originally packaged with the >>>product, >>>> > > > > including >>>> > > > > p> cable, software, manual, etc. You must obtain an RMA >>number >>>> before >>>> > > you >>>> > > > > p> return any defective or DOA products. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> REQUIRES ORIGINAL BOX ON DOA UNITS... DOA MEANS DEAD ON >>>ARRIVAL >>>> > > HENCE >>>> > > > > YOU >>>> > > > > p> JUST GOT IT SO THEY WANT IT BACK HOW THEY SENT IT SINCE >IT >>>WAS >>>> DEAD >>>> > > AS >>>> > > > > SOON >>>> > > > > p> AS YOU GOT IT. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> As for the returning on a one to one basis it is not FINE >>>PRINT >>>> it >>>> > > is >>>> > > > > p> blatantly shown in Standard Sized text under the warranty >>>> > > conditions. >>>> > > > > Not >>>> > > > > p> like they used size 1 font to try to hide it from you. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> Sorry if I'm being a di*k but this is just my take on >your >>>> comment. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> Chris >>>> > > > > p> -----Original Message----- >>>> > > > > p> From: Tom & Toni Maris >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > p> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:44 PM >>>> > > > > p> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more >than >>>> $6,000.00 >>>> > > in >>>> > > > > this >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. >>>> > > > > p> On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we >>>read >>>the >>>> > > fine >>>> > > > > print >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just >>>> > > replacement >>>> > > > > units >>>> > > > > p> and that you have to have the original box! >>>> > > > > p> Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier >>>class. >>>> > > > > p> This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like >an >>>honest >>>> > > > > company. >>>> > > > > p> First I would like to know where they get off saying >>>anything >>>> about >>>> > > > > Carrier >>>> > > > > p> class. >>>> > > > > p> Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, >>>why do >>>> you >>>> > > need >>>> > > > > an >>>> > > > > p> original box to sned them back, and why don't they do >>>refunds? >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this >>>Smartbridge >>>> > > company >>>> > > > > p> stand behind their products or give everyone their money >>>back. >>>He >>>> > > thinks >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> that their is probably enough people like us who got >>ripped >>>off >>>> to >>>> > > get a >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> class action lawsuite against the company who sold us >this >>>pile >>>> of >>>> > > junk >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> Very very disapointed >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> T n T >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > > > >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>>new >>>> > > firmware? >>>> > > > > >>Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700 >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Okay so it appears I am not the only one having the >problem >>>here >>>> We >>>> > > hav >>>> > > > > >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some as far as 7.2 >miles >>>the >>>> last >>>> > > > > >>revision 0.01.06 just will not associate to any of my APS >I >>>had >>>> > > sugested >>>> > > > > >>there is something going on here and I am finally able to >>>get on >>>> this >>>> > > > > list >>>> > > > > >>and post only to see what I have been telling support >since >>>last >>>> week >>>> > > > > >>before >>>> > > > > >>the release only to be told its been working well in the >>>"LAB" >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be >>>tested >>>> in >>>> > > a >>>> > > > > >>consistant manor not just really close up. >>>> > > > > >>1. Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if >>possible >>>> > > > > >>2. At each point do some speed tests to confirm it is >>>working >>>and >>>> how >>>> > > > > well >>>> > > > > >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get >>>association >>>but >>>> > > speeds >>>> > > > > >>are >>>> > > > > >>WAY down. >>>> > > > > >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of >>>testing >>>> before >>>> > > ANY >>>> > > > > >>final revision is released to save time and nerves of >those >>>of >>>us >>>> in >>>> > > the >>>> > > > > >>field! >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have >>>been >>>> tested >>>> > > in >>>> > > > > the >>>> > > > > >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this something >>>that is >>>a >>>> > > > > secret?? >>>> > > > > >>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that >are >>>> working >>>> > > rock >>>> > > > > >>solid and have ALL my customers down. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> We have tried it (ver 0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I >>>have >>>> seen >>>> > > > > >>problems >>>> > > > > >>but to be fair we still need to identify if this firmware >>is >>>> > > compatible >>>> > > > > >>with >>>> > > > > >>the OLD atmel chip they had. We tried this new firmware on >>>the >>>> only >>>> > > radio >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>we >>>> > > > > >>have left since the other 2 locked up hardcore and are now >>>> doorstops >>>> > > > > after >>>> > > > > >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just before the >>>final >>>> > > release. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and we >found >>>the >>>> same >>>> > > > > thing >>>> > > > > >>on rev 2 >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>I don't how you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware >>>is >>>not >>>> > > > > >>compatible >>>> > > > > >>with the old good atmel chip per say. >>>> > > > > >>The two test radios that locked up we just bought less >then >>>a >>>> month >>>> > > ago so >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>I >>>> > > > > >>can only assume they had the problem. Unless they can come >>>up >>>with >>>> a >>>> > > way >>>> > > > > to >>>> > > > > >>positively identify which units are suspect with the >>suspect >>>chip. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>I suggest you do the same tests with a spare radio that >you >>>can >>>> > > afford >>>> > > to >>>> > > > > >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically what >>>happens is >>>> the >>>> > > > > radio >>>> > > > > >>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to >>>log >>>into >>>> > > the >>>> > > > > >>radio, the power and wireless light stay on solid and you >>no >>>> longer >>>> > > get a >>>> > > > > >>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and >>>don't >>>> see >>>> > > how >>>> > > > > >>that would work since that just resets passwords and the >IP >>>> address >>>> > > etc >>>> > > > > but >>>> > > > > >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to >>>unlock >>>it >>>> but >>>> > > > > that >>>> > > > > >>was useless because you need a network connection to the >>>radio >>>> > > hahaha. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you >>can >>>see >>>> in >>>> > > our >>>> > > > > >>notes does not work for us yet Smart bridges claims it >>works >>>well >>>> in >>>> > > the >>>> > > > > >>lab >>>> > > > > >>and others have tested as well which I would like to know >>>how >>>far >>>> > > away >>>> > > > > they >>>> > > > > >>tested the radio. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>1. ver 0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 >>>miles >>>we >>>> > > > > associate >>>> > > > > >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads fine >>and >>>at >>>> same >>>> > > 3.5 >>>> > > > > >>mile location we get not even half the speeds we did with >>>rev >>>> 0.01.04 >>>> > > we >>>> > > > > >>get >>>> > > > > >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet loss. >>>> > > > > >>RSSI 85% and signal quality 90-95% with both firmware. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with >>>firmware >>>> > > 0.01.04 >>>> > > > > get >>>> > > > > >>speeds of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final >>>revision >>>> and >>>> > > we >>>> > > > > >>associate but thats it radio will not ping APPO on tower >>but >>>we >>>> can >>>> > > ping >>>> > > > > >>ABO >>>> > > > > >>radio with new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with >>>both >>>> > > firmware. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>So as you can see this firmware will not work for us. I >>>don't >>>> > > understand >>>> > > > > >>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing >>>issue? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>The only question I have is will version 0.01.06 work on >>old >>>> radios >>>> > > with >>>> > > > > >>old >>>> > > > > >>atmel chip? and if not then we will proceed further to >load >>>the >>>> > > 0.01.06 >>>> > > > > on >>>> > > > > >>clients radios but once again we have no way of telling >>>which >>>> radios >>>> > > have >>>> > > > > >>new or old atmel chip? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs >>>> > > > > >>out to 7.2 miles. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>>> > > > > >>From: "Colorado Wisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM >>>> > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>>new >>>> > > firmware? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Nish, >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>We updated several of one of our "overheating" units this >>>morning >>>> and >>>> > > it >>>> > > > > >>will not associate with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have >no >>>plans >>>> to >>>> > > > > update >>>> > > > > >>the firmware on the APs, they have been rock solid. Is >>>there >>>> going >>>> > > to >>>> > > be >>>> > > > > >>firmware that will interact this firmware version? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Chris >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>--- >>>> > > > > >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net >>>> > > > > >>Bringing high speed internet to rural communities. >>>> > > > > >>P.O. Box 55 >>>> > > > > >>Wellington, Colorado 80549 >>>> > > > > >>970-218-5295 >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>>> > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>On Behalf Of Nish Park >>>> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 2:49 AM >>>> > > > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>>new >>>> > > firmware? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Tim, >>>> > > > > >>Can you please elaborate a little more on this "still >doing >>>the >>>> same >>>> > > > > >>thing!". What was the problem, new unit (June or July >>>purchase?), >>>> > > RSSI >>>> > > > > and >>>> > > > > >>LQ values, Brand of AP? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>We have confirmed that the problem of loosing association >>at >>>> elevated >>>> > > > > >>temperature has been solved. This has been the focus of >all >>>our >>>> > > efforts >>>> > > > > and >>>> > > > > >>we are quire confident that issue no longer exist. Now we >>>will >>>be >>>> > > > > focusing >>>> > > > > >>on testing if there has been any other side effects. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >From some of the emails it appears that some of you are >>>trying >>>> to >>>> > > see >>>> > > > > >> >if >>>> > > > > >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of >>>"periodic >>>> > > lockup". >>>> > > I >>>> > > > > >>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but >that >>>has >>>> not >>>> > > been >>>> > > > > >>the >>>> > > > > >>focus of the current activity on hand. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Thanks for your support. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Nish >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>>> > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >>On Behalf Of Tim Harris >>>> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:32 PM >>>> > > > > >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>>> > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >>>new >>>> > > firmware? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit. >Had >>>to >>>> unplug >>>> > > it >>>> > > > > to >>>> > > > > >>get it to start working after uploading the new firmware. >>>Started >>>> > > > > working >>>> > > > > >>fine. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Customer called back an hour later and left two messages, >>>still >>>> doing >>>> > > the >>>> > > > > >>same thing! >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........ >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might have a >>>point. >>>> This >>>> > > > > seems >>>> > > > > >>to be getting ridiculous. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response >>>then.. >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>Tim Harris, Operations >>>> > > > > >>www.dwisp.net >>>> > > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>>> > > > > >>From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > > > > >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM >>>> > > > > >>Subject: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >>>> firmware? >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting >ready >>>to >>>> try, >>>> > > but >>>> > > > > >> > wanted to check first to see what sort of luck others >>>have >>>had. >>>> > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > >> > Thanks >>>> > > > > >> > Sam >>>> > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>> subscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> > > > > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body >type >>>> > > unsubscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>>> > > > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>subscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: >>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > (in >>>> > > > > the >>>> > > > > >>body type unsubscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>subscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: >>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > (in >>>> > > > > the >>>> > > > > >>body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >>>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>subscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>> unsubscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>subscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>> unsubscribe >>>> > > > > >>smartBridges) >>>> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> >>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>> > > > > p> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* >>>> > > > > p> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > p> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > p> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>subscribe >>>> > > > > p> smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> > > > > p> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>> unsubscribe >>>> > > > > p> smartBridges) >>>> > > > > p> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > -- >>>> > > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>subscribe >>>> > > smartBridges >>>> > > > > <yournickname> >>>> > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>unsubscribe >>>> > > > > smartBridges) >>>> > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Martin Moreno >>>> > > > Blazen Wireless >>>> > > > 909-907-4106 >>>> > > > www.blazenwireless.com >>>> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>subscribe >>>> > > smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>unsubscribe >>>> > > smartBridges) >>>> > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > --- >>>> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >>>> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>>> > > Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 >>>> > > >>>> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>>> smartBridges >>>> > > <yournickname> >>>> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>>unsubscribe >>>> > > smartBridges) >>>> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Martin Moreno >>>> > Blazen Wireless >>>> > 909-907-4106 >>>> > www.blazenwireless.com >>>> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>>> smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>unsubscribe >>>> smartBridges) >>>> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >>>> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>>> Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 >>>> >>>> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>>smartBridges) >>>> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> >>>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>>smartBridges) >>>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> >>>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>>smartBridges) >>>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>> >>> >>>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>smartBridges) >>>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>>--- >>>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] >>> >>> >>--- >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >>smartBridges <yournickname> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >>smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >>--- >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] >> >> >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges ><yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
