----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:10
PM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge
APPO max client associations?
Didn't sb say they were releaseing a RTS auto configurator for
installers to use with townspot or something like that?
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin
Summers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the most part you'll have to play with it and see
what happens. There isn't a tried and true set of
settings
that will work for everyone's
situation.
Kevin Summers
KISTech Internet
Services Inc.
www.kistech.com
> -----Original Message-----
>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Blazen Wireless
> Sent: Thursday, July
31, 2003 12:03 PM
> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
[smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations?
>
>
> could I
do settings at both to tweak it even further?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Summers"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday,
July 31, 2003 12:03 PM
> Subject: RE:
[smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations?
>
>
>
> Correct. RTS would be available on the AP for when it's
acting as a CPE.
>
>
Fragmentation can be set at the CPE or the AP or both. It depends
> on which direction the larger packets are coming from.
If it's
> the customer's downloading a lot, set it
on the AP to break up the
> packets. If it's
uploads, set it at the CPE to break them up there.
>
> Kevin Summers
> KISTech Internet Services Inc.
>
www.kistech.com
>
> >
-----Original Message-----
> > From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Blazen Wireless
> > Sent: Thursday,
July 31, 2003 11:54 AM
> > To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
[smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations?
> >
> >
> > Isn't 2347 disabled?? or what is that # for even thought
it
> says max I was
>
> told 2347 shuts RTS off? can someone verify that because it
> will allow you
> > to put
2347 in the setting. This also helps me now because I was
> > questioning
> > if you had to
change the RTS on the AP as well? what about
> >
fragmentation on
> > the AP so you mess with
that or leave it at 2346? I am assuming that the
>
> settings are there for when you use an APPO in client bridge mode
> > correct??
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:20 AM
> > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client
associations?
> >
>
>
> > Just be aware that RTS needs to be set
on the client devices.
> > Don't set it
> > on
> > the AP.
Leave the AP at 2346 (RTS disabled).
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > Quoting Kevin
Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >
> > > In a
crowded environment RTS being lowered can help because
> > > it allows a client radio to send a Request To Send to
the AP
> > > and the AP tells everyone else
to shut up while the client
> > > sends off
it's packets. Something like 1024 would be a good
>
> > test setting to start with just to see if it would help.
> > >
> > > The
Frag Threshold tells the AP to break up the packets when
> > > the exceed the specified size. That causes more (but
smaller)
> > > packets to be sent through the
air, allowing for more clients
> > > to get
data through.
> > >
> > > Typically you want to only adjust one at a time to see
which
> > > one is going to be that little
bit of "Magic" for your particular
> > >
situation.
> > >
>
> > Kevin Summers
> > > KISTech
Internet Services Inc.
> > >
www.kistech.com
> > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Eric Helm
> > > Sent: Thursday,
July 31, 2003 9:29 AM
> > > To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re:
[smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations?
> > >
> > >
> > > RTS and Frag are both set at 2346... not sure what this
does or
> > means? any
> > > explanation and example of what changing these values
does
> > would be great.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eric
> > >
----- Original Message -----
> > > From:
phantam
> > > To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Sent:
Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:21 AM
> > >
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations?
> > >
> > >
> > > 35 should work matters if the RTS and frag are
all tweaked or
> > are they all
> > > talking at the same time? The clients that is. I have
about 28
> > on my pop's
> > > and we had swore at one point not to go above 25 on our
site
> hence we're
>
> > upgrading personally we don't use splitters its another point
> of failure
> > >
but
> > > it should work with the amp none
the less. It really depends
> on use the
> > > 11mb
> > > RF
is aggregate and shared so if everyones on or all the radios are
> > talking
> > > or
evne the majority there going to go nuts.
> >
> Chris
> > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > From: Eric Helm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:04 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > What is the max client associations on an APPO
without
> comprimising the
> > > performance of the throughput?
> > > I have 1 APPO that has 35 clients on it, and 1 APPO that
has only 5
> > > clients... the lesser of the
two can get 2 Mbps throuput, which
> > is what
we
> > > are feeding it from the backhaul,
however on the APPO with 35
> > clients,
the
> > > max throughput I can get is about
700 to 800 Kbps. The setup is as
> > >
follows:
> > > 1 APPO --> .5 Watt Amp
--> Splitter --> 2 - 120 degree sector
>
antennas.
> > > 1 APPO --> 1 - 120 degree
sector antenna
> > > The APPO experiencing
throughput problems it the one that has
> > the
splitter
> > > on it.. could this be causing
the problem? We just purchased
> > the WISP
that
> > > setup the APPOs and I am not
opposed to adding a 3rd APPO if
> > that would
be
> > > a
> >
> viable solution, but I am concerned if 35 clients is going to
> hinder the
> > >
performance that much.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eric
> >
>
> > >
> >
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges
<yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
> > >
smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> > smartBridges
> > > <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
> > >
smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> >
> > >
>
>
> >
> > The
PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To
Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges
<yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion
List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> > smartBridges
<yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
> > unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> smartBridges
<yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> smartBridges
<yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
> unsubscribe smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
